Definitely a fair point.
My argument would be that there were games earlier in the year where the Jets outplayed or played very even with our opponents and got zilch. The Boston and Toronto games here come to mind. Even that first Washington game here, Jets outplayed the Caps badly through 20 minutes and had nothing.
We've got a few posters here that can describe pretty accurately how much the Jets success can be ascribed to luck (or overachieving, I suppose). Subjectively, I would say 2 games above .500 is about where they should be.
I'm going to do something different... No stats [ok I snuck one stat in] :O OMG!!!!
My opinion of this whole season was from the start...
We're a middle of the road team.
We have decent depth but not enough to take injuries without setbacks.
We live and die by goaltending as we're good enough to hold against any team but not good enough to dominate without it.
Now to go pseudo statistical...
We have 3 legit first liners (Kane, Ladd, Wheeler), 1 high-end second liner (Little), a slew of third liners of variable levels (Antropov, Burmistrov, Miettinen, Jokinen (should be in the 2nd liner list but regressed), Wellwood, Ponikarovsky(RIP)) and then the rest are either solid (Wright!!) or pitiful 4th liners.
We have had at minimum one 3rd pairing calibre defenseman playing in our top4 for every game this season.
I said this team needed at least one of two things to hit the playoffs, if not both:
SV% around 0.910-0.920 (I don't care if you believe it's due to goalies or players; it's a team need)[and yes I snuck in a stat]
Healthy top4 D
...So far, we have only had one for spurts (and surprise, surprise, it pushed us to 1st in SE) and the other for ~5 mins...
We've lucked out with poor play/injuries from Carolina, Tampa Bay and Washington