Riverdale
Registered User
- Jan 14, 2012
- 5,894
- 0
They could win the Cup and I'd still want him fired.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/b5f7c/b5f7c572a0b8008c425e3a6c60ee2a5b72587765" alt="handclap :handclap: :handclap:"
I want a GM that fields a competitive team now and can set up the team for the future as well.
They could win the Cup and I'd still want him fired.
I'll always say Sather long ago should have been fired and my opinion on that will never change.
They could win the Cup and I'd still want him fired.
That shows your mind set. Its not about the team. Its about you.
All this talk of Slats trading away our first round picks. In his 13-14 years I think he has traded 2 or 3 first round picks and acquired 1. That is hardly a dramatic net amount for a professional team.
That would be a salvation. Sadly, I fear we will be saddled with Jackass for many more years.If we win the Cup I think he'd finally retire.
That shows your mind set. Its not about the team. Its about you.
All this talk of Slats trading away our first round picks. In his 13-14 years I think he has traded 2 or 3 first round picks and acquired 1. That is hardly a dramatic net amount for a professional team.
That shows your mind set. Its not about the team. Its about you.
All this talk of Slats trading away our first round picks. In his 13-14 years I think he has traded 2 or 3 first round picks and acquired 1. That is hardly a dramatic net amount for a professional team.
That would be a salvation. Sadly, I fear we will be saddled with Jackass for many more years.
That shows your mind set. Its not about the team. Its about you.
All this talk of Slats trading away our first round picks. In his 13-14 years I think he has traded 2 or 3 first round picks and acquired 1. That is hardly a dramatic net amount for a professional team.
Of our top-two round picks from 2013 to 2015, Sather has traded 4 of 6 while netting a guy who is nearly 40, a guy who played 13 games with us, and a guy who has scored 1 goal in 25 post season games as a Ranger. Kind of dramatic when you acknowledge the time frame in which he's dealt all of these high picks.
It'll be four 1st rounders if we win tonight. That's not really the point though. It's who he deals them for as much as it is the fact that he dealt them away. MSL likely doesn't have that many years left in the tank. Nash is a head-case. Bure had no knees. Multiple picks for Clowe who had major concussion issues.
Of our top-two round picks from 2013 to 2015, Sather has traded 4 of 6 while netting a guy who is nearly 40, a guy who played 13 games with us, and a guy who has scored 1 goal in 25 post season games as a Ranger. Kind of dramatic when you acknowledge the time frame in which he's dealt all of these high picks.
If we win tonight we're 4 wins from the SFC. Without MSL, we aren't in this situation, period.
Is it ideal? No
But I'll live with it
That's entirely subjective.
That's entirely subjective.
So is the idea that Sather is so bad that even if we win a cup he should still be fired.
He should have been fired but if we win the cup than looking a the past 5 years it would be fact that he figured it out, got the right combo of players and contributed to staving off another 54 year nightmare. Arguably...to your point...with a better GM we would have already won another one...of course THAT'S subjective too and may be incorrect. You're defending subjective arguments by pointing out the counter is subjective.
The idea is that his entire body of work is so horrific that he should be dismissed, despite what happens. The reason for the Rangers overall mediocrity rests squarely on him.So is the idea that Sather is so bad that even if we win a cup he should still be fired.
So is the idea that Sather is so bad that even if we win a cup he should still be fired.
He should have been fired but if we win the cup than looking a the past 5 years it would be fact that he figured it out, got the right combo of players and contributed to staving off another 54 year nightmare. Arguably...to your point...with a better GM we would have already won another one...of course THAT'S subjective too and may be incorrect. You're defending subjective arguments by pointing out the counter is subjective.
The idea is that his entire body of work is so horrific that he should be dismissed, despite what happens. The reason for the Rangers overall mediocrity rests squarely on him.
Winning the Stanley Cup is a monumental task. Many say, the hardest championship to win in all of sports.
Building an NHL dynasty? uh yeah, even harder.
I say WIN NOW. WIN NOW!
This thing is up for grabs. The team we have feared most in the ECF may not even make it there, and even if they do it's been shown they are beatable.
Why not us?
WIN NOW.