KevSkillz4
Registered User
- Apr 11, 2016
- 8,112
- 13,664
If Bombshell is a president one day, He would 100% speak like Donald Trump
Still waiting. 500$? 1000?90 points? Care to make a wager?
In what alternate dimension was Landeskog 0.83 PPG in his D+1 OHL year?
In his D+1 season, he was playing in the NHL for the Avs lmao
View attachment 667819
Are you related to him ? I mean it's pretty clear why everybody "attacks u". We can't comment on his season without you saying "Have you seen him play all season?". . I mean it's really annoying and that's why you get all the heat.no its some people coming in here and acting like punks because i'm making a prediction while they just sit in their corner and mock me for it.
I dont need to impress no one, however i do like to hear some other posters who watch him play and give their 2 cents. I dislike people whinning about the pick for the sake of whinning.
The truth is always in the middle, its just unfortunate Mesar's efforts are not valued, he generates so much offense .
"Maybe"Ok maybe Landeskog was not the best example.
So you can’t name a single player who had the trajectory that you insist Mesar will have? Do I have I have that right?Ok maybe Landeskog was not the best example.
So you can’t name a single player who had the trajectory that you insist Mesar will have? Do I have I have that right?
You can’t backup your arguments here. It’s not the first time you have done this.It seems you like to have the others do all the work for you while you sitting comfortably on your chair arguing with no facts.
At this point you need to start lifting your own fingers and do your own research and come to your own conclusions.
If you can name five players who played in the CHL and had a PPG of 1.00 or lower in their D+1 season and in the NHL ended up as PPG or near-PPG I will concede to you and defend you as an honourable gentleman.Well MSL was undrafted, never played in the OHL, i would say he had a worst trajectory than Mesar "on paper" therefore Mesar's path to ascension should be easier with your logic.
Define how many examples you need, will 5 be enough and we call it a day?
Challenge acceptedIf you can name five players who played in the CHL and had a PPG of 1.00 or lower in their D+1 season and in the NHL ended up as PPG or near-PPG I will concede to you and defend you as an honourable gentleman.
So by your logic, everybody that was drafted or played in the OHL had a better trajectory than MSL?Well MSL was undrafted, never played in the OHL, i would say he had a worst trajectory than Mesar "on paper" therefore Mesar's path to ascension should be easier with your logic.
Define how many examples you need, will 5 be enough and we call it a day?
If you can name five players who played in the CHL and had a PPG of 1.00 or lower in their D+1 season and in the NHL ended up as PPG or near-PPG I will concede to you and defend you as an honourable gentleman.
So by your logic, everybody that was drafted or played in the OHL had a better trajectory than MSL?
Can you really ask for a whole lot more at the back of the 1st round? Getting a useful middle 6 or 2nd pair D is a reasonable ask but anything much better is a stretch.hey, i hope youre right since it is in all of our best interest, but I don;t have much hope. I'm thinking his ceiling will be a Lekonnen type player, or maybe a Tatar.
While decent if reached, as a 1st rounder you obviously hope for more.
Still waiting for an answer to my wager offer.Martin Erat, (In todays era he would of been closer to PPG)
1999. WHL: 66 GP , 53 PTS 0.8 PPG
2006. NHL: 68 GP , 57 PTS 0.83 PPG (top 93 in scoring)
David Krejci, (Assistant Captain)
2004. QHL: 62 GP , 63 PTS
2008, NHL: 82 GP , 73 PTS
Radulov, 1.15 PPG in the Q, PPG+ with Dallas 2018
Tyler Bertuzzi, D+1, OHL 29 GP and 35 Pts, 2021 Detroit, 68 GP, 62 PTS. 35 pts in 29 games, he was below PPG before that season, this would qualify in my opinion as a disappointing D+1 season. Even if its due to injury.
Bonus: Joe Pavelski
The issue is that for the Canadian players, they play 1-2 seasons before getting drafted and the most often than not they only draft players with PPG+, almost every time.
The ones who dont get drafted are the ones with the weaker PPGs usually. So the next thing to do is look at the undrafted 18 years olds who had a weak PPG and see how many made it in the NHL and had succesful careers
Also alot of the europeans who become good don't play in the CHL ever or dont even get drafted by a CHL team... there's also the players who play NCAA... there's a huge list of NCAA players who do below PPG and have succesful careers with around PPG
c'est pas sa que j'ais dit pas du tout lgros....
One man show.This thread is hilarious
Martin Erat, (In todays era he would of been closer to PPG)
1999. WHL: 66 GP , 53 PTS 0.8 PPG
2006. NHL: 68 GP , 57 PTS 0.83 PPG (top 93 in scoring)
David Krejci, (Assistant Captain)
2004. QHL: 62 GP , 63 PTS
2008, NHL: 82 GP , 73 PTS
Radulov, 1.15 PPG in the Q, PPG+ with Dallas 2018
Tyler Bertuzzi, D+1, OHL 29 GP and 35 Pts, 2021 Detroit, 68 GP, 62 PTS. 35 pts in 29 games, he was below PPG before that season, this would qualify in my opinion as a disappointing D+1 season. Even if its due to injury.
Bonus: Joe Pavelski
The issue is that for the Canadian players, they play 1-2 seasons before getting drafted and the most often than not they only draft players with PPG+, almost every time.
The ones who dont get drafted are the ones with the weaker PPGs usually. So the next thing to do is look at the undrafted 18 years olds who had a weak PPG and see how many made it in the NHL and had succesful careers
Also alot of the europeans who become good don't play in the CHL ever or dont even get drafted by a CHL team... there's also the players who play NCAA... there's a huge list of NCAA players who do below PPG and have succesful careers with around PPG
c'est pas sa que j'ais dit pas du tout lgros....
Of course! He plays on a bad team with bad coaching...Something tells me a part of it is the team he plays on. Even Pinelli, as a second rounder with OHL experience in his D+1, barely got over ppg.
Of course! He plays on a bad team with bad coaching...
Not many people are saying Mesar is bad. Myself I think he could somewhat easily end up being Koivu-like, a 60-65 pts player on the small side that plays wtith intensity.
We're just saying he's not gonna get 130 points in the NHL lol.
I honestly thought you were a troll. Now I'm not sure about it. This is either a full commitment to the troll life, or you're just a great poster with a different opinion. keep dropping the bombshells!
That's a hypothetical situation that, unfortunatley, didn't materialize. I'm saying I think Mesar can become the Koivu we got to see for his career.Do you realize Koivu was 1.12 PPG in his second year before he got injured? Thats 92 Pts over a period of 82 games and in 1996-1997 he would of finished 8th in points if that happend. Last year's 8th place was Tkachuk with 104 pts. See how every road leads to Rome?
That's a hypothetical situation that, unfortunatley, didn't materialize. I'm saying I think Mesar can become the Koivu we got to see for his career.
And I'm a HUGE Koivu fan.