Chazz Reinhold
Registered User
If Athaniseeyou is smart, he calls Fiala and offers him #22 for a Rolex.
Considering AA is a UFA and won't be coming back, seems like a pretty poor trade from Fiala's standpoint.
Seems like a steep price for Fiala, who is coming off his best season. Are we sure he's ever going to reproduce the same numbers ever again? It's a risk. He was in a contract year. How often do we see players have a crazy season in a contract year and never produce again?
Sounds like Faber didn't intend on signing with LA, so including him makes sense. The 19th overall was obsolete as our pool is so steep and adding another mid first round pick who won't make an impact until 3-4 years down the road never made sense.
Just wondering if maybe we could've landed a better/more established player with that package? I'm not sold on Fiala simply because we haven't seen this type of production consistently. It's a risk but I respect risks. Danault was a risk and a lot of money; that turned out fine.
Cheap, but I'm linking back to what I posted above. The dude has been a force at 5 on 5 for 3 straight seasons now. Last season wasn't some total aberration that came out of nowhere.View attachment 563488
From even another angle, he's 17th in the league in 5-on-5 points per 60 minutes of ice time the past 3 seasons for players with more than 1500 minutes of ice time. Some pretty good company on that list!
And even if you want to exclude this past season as an outlier, from 2019-20 and 2020-21 he was still 27th in the league in 5-on-5 P/60 for players with more than 1250 minutes of 5-on-5 ice time (which sets the bar at about 100 games played over the course of those 2 seasons). He obviously had a great season this past season, especially once he started playing with Boldy, but it's not like he couldn't score before.
Last edited: