Its contractual risk. A 3 x 1.8 million contract virtually has 0 risk. 7-8 year deals for big money have a ton of risk.Lots can happen between now and then. If we fall off or get pennywise with him, I can see it happening. I'd like to think that Aho and Slavin are basically blank checks. I mean martinook at 1.8 is an absolute joke. That's what irritates me about this FO. They'll pay Martinook 1.8 and then devalue other players.
As a fellow John I’m required to disagree. As a Canes fan I agree with you unless it’s short term. If he could get back to his 17-18 levels of production I’d be okay with it.Depending on the contract I’m pretty meh on Klingberg being the solution.
Unless he truly believes he is a 7.5+ million dollar defender but is a victim of an awful system, wouldn’t it be smart to take a 1 year deal of 4.5-5 million then get a good contract afterwards? Instead a 7 years by 5.5 now? Sure it is a risk but we are a great situation for any defender wishing to recoup valueI’ve seen the discussions about Klingberg signing with the Canes short-term. While I think that would be ideal for the team, I see absolutely no reason why Klingberg would consider it. Why would he?
He and Manson are the only top 4 capable RD in this UFA class and there are multiple teams, flush with cash and cap space, in need of top 4 RD. I don’t see why the braintrust would pick 30yr old Klingberg for multiple years over 2yrs of 26yr old TDA at $5M, but here we are. If they end up with Klingberg, they’re going to have to give him significant term.
I still don’t see it happening, but I’d prefer them to add Klingberg vs some of the other options in Burns or Petry. Maybe they have something else up their sleeve entirely. Who knows. They’ll be active no matter what today and this week.
I go only by that I presume to know how a Finnman's brain works. Aho got a good thing going in Raleigh.Lots can happen between now and then. If we fall off or get pennywise with him, I can see it happening.
Unless he truly believes he is a 7.5+ million dollar defender but is a victim of an awful system, wouldn’t it be smart to take a 1 year deal of 4.5-5 million then get a good contract afterwards? Instead a 7 years by 5.5 now? Sure it is a risk but we are a great situation for any defender wishing to recoup value
That is probaly the correct answer. But, I don't exactly know if they have been officially allowed to talk with teams since the midnight, and noon is specifically the opening of the signing period.With no free agent interview period has the league just been like screw it we know there’s tampering and we don’t care anymore?
Based on his defensive peripherals, no he isn’t a 1RD right now. Yzerman doesn’t give egregious contracts. While Francis has more money to play with than his time here, he doesn’t seem like an egregious contract giver either. If those are the three teams being mentioned, I don’t see any of them giving that much AAV.In this market, is he not a $7.5M D?
I think you could easily make the argument that he is being a RHD and consistently putting up 40pts+. He has a better track record than Faulk did when Faulk got his $6.5M. The market has only gone up since then.
I don’t see the Canes coming anywhere close to $7.5M, but I could easily see him getting that or even more on the open market. To me, there’s way too much risk in taking a 1yr deal vs the sure things he’ll be offered today.
Based on his defensive peripherals, no he isn’t a 1RD right now. Yzerman doesn’t give egregious contracts. While Francis has more money to play with than his time here, he doesn’t seem like an egregious contract giver either. If those are the three teams being mentioned, I don’t see any of them giving that much AAV.
With all due respect, your pessimism is way over the top lately. Maybe take a break from these boards for a while, you are clearly way too caught up in your feelings about TDA being traded.And he will.
With all due respect, your pessimism is way over the top lately. Maybe take a break from these boards for a while, you are clearly way too caught up in your feelings about TDA being traded.
Stop trying to poison the well for everyone else.
The ignore feature works wonders. Our fan base is pretty great on here, though. Think I’ve only ignored like one other person before. Reading constant raging or endless pessimism gets old after a while.
I could see Klingberg for 6 or 7 years at a a discounted AAV. He gets term and still big money but gets to contend too which he wouldn’t do in Detroit or Seattle. Hopefully his market is worse than he thinks it is. Like you guys I like him but not if the cost is too high. 5.5-6 is ideally the most we would do
The ignore feature works wonders. Our fan base is pretty great on here, though. Think I’ve only ignored like one other person before. Reading constant raging or endless pessimism gets old after a while.