NyQuil
Big F$&*in Q
Is he the greatest player to never be great?
I had high hopes for the Hodgson-Virtanen-Kravtsov line.
Is he the greatest player to never be great?
Backed up on defense by Olli Juolevi and Frank CorradoI had high hopes for the Hodgson-Virtanen-Kravtsov line.
see Kirill Petrov
To me it is too risky using high draft picks on players That are developed in the leagues that play very different hockey style than NHL and different size rinks. I rather draft someone a bit less skilled, but who has better understanding of NHL/playoffs and north American hockey.He went to the front of the net wide open and scored. Maybe he is learning. What a bust considering where he was drafted. Rangers like worth ethic and drafted a player that did not have that. Great scouting here, glad he is gone
Because they were at the time. How a team develops a players ALOT believe it or not.Never forget in 2019 Craig Button ranked Kravtsov and Denisenko the #1 and #2 prospects in the NHL, with Makar at #3
Russian wingers top TSN’s ranking of NHL-affiliated prospects - TSN.ca
Vitali Kravtsov of the Rangers edges fellow Russian right wing Grigori Denisenko of the Panthers in TSN Hockey’s annual list of the Top 50 NHL-affiliated prospects, while the Habs and Canucks lead all Canadian teams in the ranking with three players each.www.tsn.ca
How about also weighing in the fact that you are practically at war with theese players home country.To me it is too risky using high draft picks on players That are developed in the leagues that play very different hockey style than NHL and different size rinks. I rather draft someone a bit less skilled, but who has better understanding of NHL/playoffs and north American hockey.
absolutely, and are there any players other than Russians that refuse to give interviews in English and require a terrible incompetent translators to be hired? Do they speak to their teammates on the ice with translator's help as well? It sounds like they cater to the Russian audiences rather than American ones.How about also weighing in the fact that you are practically at war with theese players home country.
The Brannstrom - Runblad pairing for me.I had high hopes for the Hodgson-Virtanen-Kravtsov line.
Because they were at the time. How a team develops a players ALOT believe it or not.
Denisenko had a great world juniors and had the pure offensive upside to think he could eventually be as good as Panarin was during his prime, but wasn’t able to play well in the KHL. He had great offensive skillz that he was able to dominate with for Russia, but couldn’t do so in men’s pro hockey in the same way he did against juniors.I don't remember as well about Denisenko, but Kravtsov should never have been ranked that high. The reaction on the Rangers board to Button's ranking of him was basically, "lol, okay Craig, we'll take it."
Russians are overrated.Because they were at the time. How a team develops a players ALOT believe it or not.
No it was an indefensible position at the time and we should not be surprised at all to see where things stand today.Because they were at the time. How a team develops a players ALOT believe it or not.
Denisenko wasn’t even good enough to dominate against his fellow juniors in Russia. He did play very well in a Russia uniform internationally but this is yet another example of why you shouldn’t overemphasize play, good or bad, at junior tournaments and push aside their overall body of work.Denisenko had a great world juniors and had the pure offensive upside to think he could eventually be as good as Panarin was during his prime, but wasn’t able to play well in the KHL. He had great offensive skillz that he was able to dominate with for Russia, but couldn’t do so in men’s pro hockey in the same way he did against juniors.
If you look at most so-called NHL “Busts” they’re generally skilled, natural European wingers.To me it is too risky using high draft picks on players That are developed in the leagues that play very different hockey style than NHL and different size rinks. I rather draft someone a bit less skilled, but who has better understanding of NHL/playoffs and north American hockey.
Only pretend making the playoffsHe is probably happier back home and Vancouver is not really going to be making the playoffs in the next few years
If you look at most so-called NHL “Busts” they’re generally skilled, natural European wingers.
There’s one fundamental reason why. Space.
Space just doesn’t exist in the NHL. They play in systems, especially Russians and Czechs, that force play outside. That’s where open ice is. So these guys grow up never playing in traffic. If you look, almost all European wingers, playing in the NHL, minus Swedes over the last 10-12 years, those players were natural centermen. They grew up playing in traffic and know how to create space. It’s a natural development too. You can’t teach it. It’s a feel for the game. Peeling off defenders, etc. So they can convert to the wing in the NHL.
Those skilled wingers can’t create space and the worst part? You really don’t find out until they’re in the NHL, because the game is so different from even the AHL. There’s literally no space in the NHL. Players are in your face immediately. Many of these busts are really skilled too. Doesn’t matter. If you can’t create space in the NHL, you won’t score in the league.
Sweden made a fundamental change to their development programs about ten years ago, that gets away from systems and teaches more 1 on 1 play. Like we play and teach in NA. So we see a lot more natural wingers from Sweden now. Before that, same thing. Most Swedish wingers in the NHL were natural centermen.
That’s why there’s teams now, that won’t draft a skilled “natural” winger if they’re not from NA or Sweden. At least not with high picks.
There’s just zero space in the NHL. It’s like playing an entirely new position for these natural wingers when they come over. They can even have some success in the CHL, or even AHL. Depends how quick they are. In the NHL though? They got no chance a lot of the time.
Just wait until he gets to the NHL. The Rangers will be a powerhouse.
I am not going to use Kravstov as an example for Russian player/wingers as a whole. He's just a highly drafted guy who didn't make it. The fact that he is Russian has nothing to do with anything. We can all come up with lists of highly ranked players from North America, or the EU, that also failed to develop.
i think he's a good example of a familiar type of russian player. over the years, there seem to be a lot of russians who are talented enough to play top 6 in the nhl but cannot or will not do it.I am not going to use Kravstov as an example for Russian player/wingers as a whole. He's just a highly drafted guy who didn't make it. The fact that he is Russian has nothing to do with anything. We can all come up with lists of highly ranked players from North America, or the EU, that also failed to develop.