SprDaVE
Moderator
- Sep 20, 2008
- 55,370
- 40,180
OK for #3C, too much for #4C.
Kampf was 7th in ice time among forwards. That's not a prototypical 4th line center.
OK for #3C, too much for #4C.
So we got Kampf and Jarnkrok in our bottom 6 and Freidge says Tre wants to add "heavier" players in our bottom 6. He's got 4 spots left to add those types of players. Acciari, Reaves, Perry, Watson, Woods ??
I like what Kampf brings but you 100% nailed it!Don't hate the player at all - he's very good at what he does. But his is very limited.
I just feel a team cannot commit significant resources on someone who looks to be signed as the #3C, but has zero offensive acumen when the Leafs major issue most of the time is secondary scoring.
What was identified as needs at this past deadline? A #3C (to upgrade on him), a physical, bottom 6 player (which he isn't) and D.
Looks like this might be the blueprint for every trade deadline.
Kampf was 7th in ice time among forwards. That's not a prototypical 4th line center.
Kampf has a functional role and can go up and down the line up
Yeah ideally you wouldn't want to make a commitment like this to a guy who is so dependent on his linemates, but this could go in very different directions depending on who he plays with. Kampf with guys like Clifford or ZAR versus Kampf with guys like Holmberg or Engvall are very different situationsI like the Kampf signing, but this is a good point. He needs to be paired with a puck mover/line driver type to be the most effective.
Kampf was 7th in ice time among forwards. That's not a prototypical 4th line center.
Matthews was obviously waiting for this shoe to drop to make his decision that much easier to makeThat must mean Matthews is signing with the Leafs.
He didn't this past playoffs. Kampf had more points. But yes I agree, Nick Paul is a better player, but he's paid more and with a lot more term.
I'm not thrilled with the extension. It's just OK. But to be saying this is a horrible extension and to lament as if this is the end of the world is really exaggerating the situation. He's a solid player and you know what you're getting.
If he's a good player how can a 2.4 x 4 year contract be brutal?Good player. Brutal contract.
Wow they are really running it back again……..who’s next, Kerfoot and Holl?
They can't they just want something to bitch about as usual. Some people are never happy it must be a chore going through life being so miserable.For all the people crying about this signing, explain.
Username checks out.
I thought his reduced 14:06 TOI in the playoffs indicated they realized they weren't going to get it done with so little scoring but it might have simply been maximizing ROR and even per KD specific direction.Kampf is a bit unique here as his average minutes tend to be more than what most 4th liners get. He's almost closer to a 3rd liner when it comes to atoi
Kampf being 7th in ice time among forwards is a bad thing. You want your 3rd line C to be more than a 7 goal scorer.
He's a defensive specialist 4th line C with no offensive acumen. You should be able to pluck those guys in free agency for 1-2m.
Kampf was 7th in ice time among forwards. That's not a prototypical 4th line center.