F Alexis Lafreniere - Rimouski Oceanic, QMJHL (2020 Draft) Part 2

Status
Not open for further replies.

TheBeastCoast

Registered User
Mar 23, 2011
32,391
33,520
Dartmouth,NS
Top to bottom the Q is easily the worst league. Its not really debatable
So they win tons of memorial cups....produce superstar level NHL level talent and are easily the worst? People are stuck 20 years ago I am sorry. The Q is no better or worse then the WHL. The OHL is a step above both just from the depth of talent. It's like people just jam there head in the sand and ignore reality lol
 

Steve Kournianos

@thedraftanalyst
Top to bottom the Q is easily the worst league. Its not really debatable

Of course it's debatable, especially when the 2020 draft class in the QMJHL has more high-end prospects than the Dub. And this line of thinking has probably hurt the WHL and OHL in the Memorial Cup. Also, the QMJHL played the best out of the three leagues against the Russian U20s last year.

I don't think what Lafreniere is doing has anything to do with quality of competition, which is what that poster was implying.
 

JackSlater

Registered User
Apr 27, 2010
19,187
14,471
I don't think that the centre vs winger comparison matters very much in this case. Lafreniere is the type of winger who controls the play offensively, which is usually what the centre does. He isn't a complementary player but a line driver. Defensively there is only so much a winger can do but Lafreniere is a good defensive winger for his age.
 

nbwingsfan

Registered User
Dec 13, 2009
22,236
16,416
There is no doubt the Q is the weakest in terms of NHL development.

I dont have this seasons exact #s but last year out of camps NHL rosters featured 156 OHL alumni, 137 WHL alumni and just 82 QMJHL alumni. Nearly half the other 2 league. Obviously inferior.
The top end talent seems to be a little smaller in the Q, but it’s definitely not a vastly weaker league than WHL/OHL like some believe.

The difference shouldn’t make any kind of change when evaluating a player
 

Voight

#winning
Feb 8, 2012
42,019
18,554
Mulberry Street
Weaker based on something you read in the newspaper in 1987 ? Or it's just weaker because you said so ?

5 of the past 9 memorial cup champs. Last year both finalists were from the QMJHL.

Based on below. I'm not saying they don't produce talent, but they are still significantly behind the other two leagues. That's just a fact.

There is no doubt the Q is the weakest in terms of NHL development.

I dont have this seasons exact #s but last year out of camps NHL rosters featured 156 OHL alumni, 137 WHL alumni and just 82 QMJHL alumni. Nearly half the other 2 league. Obviously inferior.
 

newfy

Registered User
Jul 28, 2010
14,981
8,742
Based on below. I'm not saying they don't produce talent, but they are still significantly behind the other two leagues. That's just a fact.

Do they really produce significantly less talent than the WHL though? The OHL definitely has more depth and I'll say its the best league, but why is the WHL getting held on some pedestal above the Q?

I guess the dub has Draisatl as a high end forward but who else has the WHL produced? When youre comparing to Marchand, Crosby, Mackinnon the WHL doesnt look all that strong to me, definitely not significantly stronger
 
  • Like
Reactions: JLFGoNicsGo11

snipes

How cold? I’m ice cold.
Dec 28, 2015
55,841
64,381
Do they really produce significantly less talent than the WHL though? The OHL definitely has more depth and I'll say its the best league, but why is the WHL getting held on some pedestal above the Q?

I guess the dub has Draisatl as a high end forward but who else has the WHL produced? When youre comparing to Marchand, Crosby, Mackinnon the WHL doesnt look all that strong to me, definitely not significantly stronger

The WHL has historically been known for producing tough forwards and high end defenceman.
 

TheBeastCoast

Registered User
Mar 23, 2011
32,391
33,520
Dartmouth,NS
Based on below. I'm not saying they don't produce talent, but they are still significantly behind the other two leagues. That's just a fact.
....You can keep on stating your opinion that does not make it a fact. The WHL produces a higher number of future bottom 6 NHL players sure. The Q is developing more superstar level players and has actually been able to excel at the memorial cup, where I don't believe the WHL has a win in years. I am not even trying to say the Q is or isn't the worst league of the 3. I can accept an argument for the WHL being stronger. What I won't accept is people acting like the Q is a significant step behind the OHL and WHL because that is just straight up not true. Point blank.
 

Voight

#winning
Feb 8, 2012
42,019
18,554
Mulberry Street
Do they really produce significantly less talent than the WHL though? The OHL definitely has more depth and I'll say its the best league, but why is the WHL getting held on some pedestal above the Q?

I guess the dub has Draisatl as a high end forward but who else has the WHL produced? When youre comparing to Marchand, Crosby, Mackinnon the WHL doesnt look all that strong to me, definitely not significantly stronger

WHL produces twice the number of players, yes they don't really produce high end guys and haven't done so lately but overall the numbers are strong. Plus they are historically known more for producing defensemen, Burns, Rielly, Jones being some current examples in terms of higher end defensemen.

....You can keep on stating your opinion that does not make it a fact. The WHL produces a higher number of future bottom 6 NHL players sure. The Q is developing more superstar level players and has actually been able to excel at the memorial cup, where I don't believe the WHL has a win in years. I am not even trying to say the Q is or isn't the worst league of the 3. I can accept an argument for the WHL being stronger. What I won't accept is people acting like the Q is a significant step behind the OHL and WHL because that is just straight up not true. Point blank.

WHL last won in 2014, so half a decade. Its not "recent" but its not "long ago" either.

If they produce half of what both leagues do, how is that not a significant step behind? They may have produced more "higher end" guys recently but they are still 3rd on the list.

I think you're confused on the definitions of fact and opinion.

They produce half of what the other two leagues produce. How is that not a fact?
 

TheBeastCoast

Registered User
Mar 23, 2011
32,391
33,520
Dartmouth,NS
WHL produces twice the number of players, yes they don't really produce high end guys and haven't done so lately but overall the numbers are strong. Plus they are historically known more for producing defensemen, Burns, Rielly, Jones being some current examples in terms of higher end defensemen.



WHL last won in 2014, so half a decade. Its not "recent" but its not "long ago" either.

If they produce half of what both leagues do, how is that not a significant step behind? They may have produced more "higher end" guys recently but they are still 3rd on the list.



They produce half of what the other two leagues produce. How is that not a fact?
My issue isnt with them being 3rd on the list. My issue is with you making it seem like it is a distant 3rd. What does a league filling the NHL with bottom 6 players have any relevancy to Lafreniere when he is playing in a league that had 4 of the top 10 scores in the entire league.
5 years is also an eternity in junior hockey. They havent won a game at the mem cup in years. I can accept the arguement for the whl over the Q in a quantity over quality sense but "well they develop more players so they are obviously better" is surface level stuff.
 

blinkman360

Loyal Players Only
Dec 30, 2005
11,936
1,498
Lawn Guyland
Do they really produce significantly less talent than the WHL though? The OHL definitely has more depth and I'll say its the best league, but why is the WHL getting held on some pedestal above the Q?

I guess the dub has Draisatl as a high end forward but who else has the WHL produced? When youre comparing to Marchand, Crosby, Mackinnon the WHL doesnt look all that strong to me, definitely not significantly stronger

Barzal is the only other one recently I can think of off the top of my head. Overall though I'd say the Q pumps out the better forwards; Dub the better defensemen; while the O just constantly produce everything.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Fenris

Sens of Anarchy

Registered User
Jul 9, 2013
67,082
52,749
we have the best tank commander in the league


View attachment 268741
Disagree
We have a natural
cut.jpg
 
  • Like
Reactions: larrypacman8167
Status
Not open for further replies.

Ad

Upcoming events

Ad

Ad