Yeah, there will always be someone who has a dumb hot take. Why is it worth mentioning?
The consensus did not think Lafreniere was the best prospect since McDavid. No knowledgeable observer of the sport thought that.
it seemed like the consensus was he was in that tier down from mcdavid - matthews/eichel/mackinnon etc, somewhere in there. i don't really care where people want to put him, it'll play out, but that was the tier people had him in.
the rush to judgement on him is kinda absurd at this point ..i mean he hadn't played a game since march. who knows what training access he had btw season end and ny arrival. got a makeshift 2 week camp. no preseason. thats a lot to be shortchanged of leading to your nhl debut. a guy like matthews had all of the above in full, played a year of pro, and the world cup leading into his rookie year. the one thing i think could have helped laf, and who knows looking back..but it did feel like his last q year wasn't that much different than the year prior - he was just bored. you could see at the wj's how dominant he was. but the q was a joke to him...and thinking back, being an early b-day - wonder if it would have been better for him to follow matthews lead and go overseas to challenge himself with a higher level of play and maybe keep him more engaged. not that i consider it a major impact on his production, but there are definitely times you'll see flashes of what look like bad habits...a puck will go the other way and he takes a turn like a cargo ship and an unimpressive stride or 2 before you sort of see him realize where he is and pick it up. and if you've watched the rangers, you'd know he realistically should have at least another 2-3 goals and 3-5 assists but thats been the case for a lot of the team to date. point is he has outplayed his stats for sure. its also fair to say he isn't as ready as most expected, and when you look at the bigger picture i don't think its that hard to see likelier reasons than he's a bust as explanations. right now he's not dynamic enough to be the engine of a line and thats been an issue, because no one on the rangers is. but i'd be very confident if the rangers had say a nick backstrom...or any top tier center who would lug the mail and handle a lot of possession to let him find lanes or shots in the slot, people have a very different perception of him right now. i mean you can allow for maybe he's not anything special, but i think all available pre nhl evidence says otherwise, and when you look at the big picture of his situation, he's had a lot going against him. he definitely has some physical developing to do and habits to clean up, but the ability is not in question. personally, i'd like to see him go the mackinnon route and kinda lean out...he doesn't look out of shape by any means, but he doesn't look like most young nhl'ers either...the habits i think will work themselves out - when he finds some success he'll grow more engaged and confident. while he's worn it really well i do think the lack of production is starting to weigh on him and impact his intensity.