Nikolajs Sillers
Registered User
- Jan 2, 2021
- 4,858
- 3,417
Don't do it for sake of McDavid.I can see Edmonton desperate enough to sign Kane. They need a top 6 winger.
Don't do it for sake of McDavid.I can see Edmonton desperate enough to sign Kane. They need a top 6 winger.
Hmm that could get dicey because the NHL shortened their COVID protocol to only 5 days on the 29th, so his agent may be right, they may have a case.
Only thing going for him- knocked out Matt Cooke.Too many internet lawyers here. Either way, from a hockey perspective, what a total waste of talent this guy has been since the very beginning. His career should have gone in a completely different direction. Had everything to be one of the better players of his generation. What a waste.
Yes, of course. But I think they will win.You do realise this is not the end? Litigation is just about to start.
If I’m a small market team with little media presence, I’m scrambling to set up plans for a support net for him and already on the phone with his agent.
He’s a top tier power forward in his prime, destined to score 30 goals per season and you can likely have him at a league minimum. You’re a moron if you don’t take that risk. Carolina would be a good fit.
A 30 year old player is destined to score 30 goals per season even though he has only ever done that once? Sounds like a stretchIf I’m a small market team with little media presence, I’m scrambling to set up plans for a support net for him and already on the phone with his agent.
He’s a top tier power forward in his prime, destined to score 30 goals per season and you can likely have him at a league minimum. You’re a moron if you don’t take that risk. Carolina would be a good fit.
I don't think they can really stop an NHL team from giving him a contract.
Maybe this will work out for Kane, he gets a good portion of his contract in a settlement and then is free to sign with another team for 2-3 mill a year.
LolThis guy's run out of strikes....any other union and he'd have been canned ages ago.
I don't think any outcome of this with Kane will impact FA's for SJIt could be from the Sharks perspective that they have nothing to lose. If they win in arbitration they get out of the contract. If they lose, they are forced to buy him it out which they may have done anyway.
Of course, losing would pretty much shatter the Sharks' reputation for any potential UFA coming in, but the future of the team on the ice is so far up shit creek it may not really matter.
Isn't the punishment for failure to report suspension without pay? I don't think unilateral termination of the contract is allowed for that, but I could be wrong.depending on how they count the 10 days it was either 10 or 9 days when he flew. And it sounds like he may have had medical clearance to fly. So that sounds like team doctors/team weren’t on the same page there. I think the main thing they will argue is him showing up 7 days after he was supposed to
those days (10 vs 5) are with a negative test result iircI want to know how that math works. If he tested positive on 12/21, was scheduled to return on 12/31 under a 10-day protocol, and the NHL changed the protocol to 5 days on 12/29/21, how would he have a case when he didn't return to the team until 1/6/22? Is this a common core thing?
Isn't the punishment for failure to report suspension without pay? I don't think unilateral termination of the contract is allowed for that, but I could be wrong.
The city of Winnipeg owns the Jets?see: Jets, Winnipeg.
TNSE controls the media here, and calls the shots as to what gets reported. The city is so paranoid of losing the Jets that any reporter who breaks ranks, and goes against TNSE soon finds himself without credentials to access the team or dressing room.
Winnipeg tried everything humanly possible to control Kane, and it didn't work.
No, he was threatening it to have the court not claim those earnings for his creditors. Thats over now, this money was all his to keep.Didnt Kane want his contract terminated because of gambling debts?
it didn't help that the kneeling player was in decline, had been demoted from being the starter then demanded to any teams interested in him that he be paid like he was a starter if they signed him, ghosted private workouts..etc..They can’t stop an NHL team but they can “recommend” that no owner signs him. There’s always shady stuff behind the scenes. Look at the NFL and that player that started the kneeling for the anthem trend.
That same player turned down 3 contracts and his fiancée called the owner of the ravens a slave ownerThey can’t stop an NHL team but they can “recommend” that no owner signs him. There’s always shady stuff behind the scenes. Look at the NFL and that player that started the kneeling for the anthem trend.
yup... so why's everyone picking on this poor guy?Ah so faked a vaccine card, suspended, got COVID, traveled instead of quarantined, then showed up a week late to the AHL after Christmas. Sounds justified to me.
Hmm that could get dicey because the NHL shortened their COVID protocol to only 5 days on the 29th, so his agent may be right, they may have a case.
No, he was threatening it to have the court not claim those earnings for his creditors. Thats over now, this money was all his to keep.
Isn't the punishment for failure to report suspension without pay? I don't think unilateral termination of the contract is allowed for that, but I could be wrong.