ESPN Top 10 Defenseman in the NHL

Malaka

you know, **** it, let’s just not think so much
Mar 3, 2020
1,925
1,721
www.youtube.com
espn is embarrassing

>> The best shorthand description of Makar's excellence is that he's essentially "Connor McDavid, except a defenseman." They both do things on the ice that their peers simply can't replicate. Both possess unapproachable skating talent. Both look like a human cheat code when they join the rush offensively.

Really? That’s the best “shorthand” description you could make?

And the very next player Q. Hughes skating does come close (if not surpasses him in silk, versus his shiftiness)
 

wetcoast

Registered User
Nov 20, 2018
24,636
11,529
Would he even make it on there?
Easily just ask Adam Clendening.

espn is embarrassing

>> The best shorthand description of Makar's excellence is that he's essentially "Connor McDavid, except a defenseman." They both do things on the ice that their peers simply can't replicate. Both possess unapproachable skating talent. Both look like a human cheat code when they join the rush offensively.

Really? That’s the best “shorthand” description you could make?

And the very next player Q. Hughes skating does come close (if not surpasses him in silk, versus his shiftiness)
Wow if you think that makes ESPN look embarrassing wonder what you think of 75% of the posts here...just saying.
 
  • Like
Reactions: HolyHagelin

Malaka

you know, **** it, let’s just not think so much
Mar 3, 2020
1,925
1,721
www.youtube.com
Easily just ask Adam Clendening.


Wow if you think that makes ESPN look embarrassing wonder what you think of 75% of the posts here...just saying.
It’s just lazy writing and journalism man. If ESPN wants to engage people with their content, they could at least bring up some salient points about his skating comparables, and qualify that characteristic for readers(both hockey fans or newcomers) interested in the technique which sets him apart — but instead you just throw an abstraction of generational talent while ignoring the very next player on the list is arguably his equal in that aspect. Fedorov and Coffey are neverminded as well

And as far as the other posts on hfboards I mean at least they have an opinion. Don’t be a nihilist coward… say what you will of national socialism but at least they had an ethos
 

wetcoast

Registered User
Nov 20, 2018
24,636
11,529
It’s just lazy writing and journalism man. If ESPN wants to engage people with their content, they could at least bring up some salient points about his skating comparables, and qualify that characteristic for readers(both hockey fans or newcomers) interested in the technique which sets him apart — but instead you just throw an abstraction of generational talent while ignoring the very next player on the list is arguably his equal in that aspect. Fedorov and Coffey are neverminded as well

And as far as the other posts on hfboards I mean at least they have an opinion. Don’t be a nihilist coward… say what you will of national socialism but at least they had an ethos
I love Quinn Hughes but you are really nitpicking here Makar is the McDavid of Dmen even if Hughes is probably going to win the Norris this year and McDavid won't win the Art Ross nor Hart.

Makar won by a fair margin here too as he had 17 of the 20 first place ballots available.
 

Malaka

you know, **** it, let’s just not think so much
Mar 3, 2020
1,925
1,721
www.youtube.com
I love Quinn Hughes but you are really nitpicking here Makar is the McDavid of Dmen even if Hughes is probably going to win the Norris this year and McDavid won't win the Art Ross nor Hart.

Makar won by a fair margin here too as he had 17 of the 20 first place ballots available.
I don't necessarily disagree. Makar appears more dominant and probably has the stats to back it. With skating I am into semantics is all.
 

wetcoast

Registered User
Nov 20, 2018
24,636
11,529
How does a NHL GM left Hughes off his list completely? Seems quite egregious considering the season Hughes is having, no?

Overall a pretty good list though.
Also 2 western conference players left Miro off their lists.

I guess it goes to show that even some that are close to the game can have bad takes like a couple of guys here eh?
 
  • Like
Reactions: sandwichbird2023

TheImpatientPanther

Registered User
Jan 17, 2013
28,544
25,565
Ontario, Canada
Would he even make it on there?

We know Rielly wouldn't :laugh:

Screenshot_20240213_204716_Samsung Internet.jpgScreenshot_20240213_204752_Samsung Internet.jpg
 

FunkySeeFunkyDo

Registered User
Aug 3, 2014
4,732
4,278
Interesting read here and not surprising really.


Breakdown was

1. Makar
2. Hughes
3. Hesikanen
4. Fox
5. McAvoy
6. Hedman
7. Josi
8. Slavin
9. Morrisey
10. Doughty
I would take Karlsson over Doughty now and for 2016 Norris.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Slimmy

jcs0218

Registered User
Apr 20, 2018
7,968
9,882
This list highlights one of the main issues that Team Canada is going to have in the 2026 Olympics.

They only have Makar as an elite defenseman who is still in his prime.

Other good defensemen that they have, such as Doughty and Pietrangelo, are clearly aging and will be worse when 2026 comes along.

Meanwhile, Team USA has Hughes, Fox, McAvoy, and Slavin all in their primes and will still be in their primes when 2026 comes.

The defense that Canada brought in 2010 and 2014 were very big reasons they won those years because nobody could compete with Canada's defensemen.

2026 is going to be very different though.
 
  • Like
Reactions: NyQuil

SI90

Registered User
Jul 25, 2011
86,622
65,182
StrongIsland
Dobson should get Norris consideration for what he’s done this year. Producing points and playing 25+ minutes a night. Also carried the isles defense with Pelech and Pulock both out for a while.

To say he isn’t top 10 is laughable

Dobson should get Norris consideration for what he’s done this year. Producing points and playing 25+ minutes a night. Also carried the isles defense with Pelech and Pulock both out for a while.

To say he isn’t top 10 is laughable
 

Gnome17

Registered User
Mar 4, 2016
5,332
6,092
Sweden
This list highlights one of the main issues that Team Canada is going to have in the 2026 Olympics.

They only have Makar as an elite defenseman who is still in his prime.

Other good defensemen that they have, such as Doughty and Pietrangelo, are clearly aging and will be worse when 2026 comes along.

Meanwhile, Team USA has Hughes, Fox, McAvoy, and Slavin all in their primes and will still be in their primes when 2026 comes.

The defense that Canada brought in 2010 and 2014 were very big reasons they won those years because nobody could compete with Canada's defensemen.

2026 is going to be very different though.
I think theyre a bit closer than you make it out in this post though, Dobson is having a real breakout year with over a ppg and +20 on a team not in a playoff position right now.
Devon Toewes, Morrisey, Dunn..They have a real good couple defense pairs, but yes USA has the edge for sure.

Dobson should get Norris consideration for what he’s done this year. Producing points and playing 25+ minutes a night. Also carried the isles defense with Pelech and Pulock both out for a while.

To say he isn’t top 10 is laughable

Dobson should get Norris consideration for what he’s done this year. Producing points and playing 25+ minutes a night. Also carried the isles defense with Pelech and Pulock both out for a while.

To say he isn’t top 10 is laughable
One more time for the people in the back!
 

Ad

Upcoming events

Ad

Ad