krutovsdonut
eeyore
- Sep 25, 2016
- 17,684
- 10,426
depends on who you ask. i thought san jose were idiots to go get ek with burns already there. plus the entire sj core aged out.Just like San Jose was supposed to win the cup with Karlsson...
depends on who you ask. i thought san jose were idiots to go get ek with burns already there. plus the entire sj core aged out.Just like San Jose was supposed to win the cup with Karlsson...
Lol where did you pull that from?For sure. Plenty of teams with $11.5m in cap space waiting to trade assets for a 33 year old dman who doesn't play d. Guy is immovable. BOS can't even get a get more than a 5th round pick for Vezina winner Ullmark and his $5m cap hit.
Just like San Jose was supposed to win the cup with Karlsson...
It doesn't. We were just next on the trade Nylander hit paradeSharks are rebuilding. How does adding a UFA aged player make any sense?
Funny thing is all the ignorant flack EK gets about his supposed non existent defence is what they are actually getting in Klingberg. That and a shell of his former self offensively.#1. The Leafs signed Klingberg 4 Days Ago. If they had any interest in Erik Karlsson, that interest dies when they sign a player who brings very, very similar things. There is no room on Toronto's D for all of Rielly, Karlsson, and Klingberg.
#2. Rewind 5 days ago, and yes, there's a justification for doing this deal from Toronto's standpoint, but it would still require substantial retention from San Jose, and their ability to value Nylander may be limited given that he may or may not be willing to sign long term there.
You are like Bizarro Ben White when it comes to Karlsson.Just like San Jose was supposed to win the cup with Karlsson...
Are you sure of that?IMO Nylander would be easy to flip during season for returning vale, not Karlsson. Would also create some interest in an otherwise glooming season for Sharks. Fun also to see EK on the Leafs.
Maybe add something from Leafs, how much retained by SJ ?
We have a point per game 27 year old forward capable of playing center and wing who’s rumored to want 9mil per season(which is a fair ask tbh given certain other players) the concern amongst fans is that we can’t afford to pay another player 9mil+ when coupled with the Tavares, Matthews and Marner contracts. I don’t think they solution is to trade him for an older more injury prone player who’s already making more than the amount we “can’t afford” due to depth concerns.
With retention? If not, you have got to be joking.He's also worth a lot more than Nylander.
Too funnyWith retention? If not, you have got to be joking.
Are there any other 40g, ppg wingers in the league that get as much disrespect as Nylander?
I hope the Sharks rebuild take another decade after some of the comments in this thread, just brutal.
Are you sure of that?
The offers you're getting aren't all that huge
And given his demands, it not like a team can get any cap help from 3rd parties on the 10 million he's supposingly asking for
Easier to slot Nylander in as one of the best wingers in the game in chase for a cup race., in most teams
Ek would require right circumstances.
Nylander also is a future asset in the right age, EK is a "roll the dice" and hope he is healthy and on for a couple of seasons. So yes I think it would be easier, safer and cheaper.
Well,if it's so easy then trade him to a team where it make at least some sense toEasier to slot Nylander in as one of the best wingers in the game in chase for a cup race., in most teams
Ek would require right circumstances.
Nylander also is a future asset in the right age, EK is a "roll the dice" and hope he is healthy and on for a couple of seasons. So yes I think it would be easier, safer and cheaper.
Player | GP | G | A | P |
Mitchell Marner | 207 | 85 | 178 | 263 |
Mikko Rantanen | 209 | 121 | 142 | 263 |
Matthew Tkachuk | 217 | 98 | 158 | 256 |
Artemi Panarin | 199 | 68 | 178 | 246 |
David Pastrnak | 202 | 121 | 117 | 238 |
Johnny Gaudreau | 218 | 80 | 158 | 238 |
Kirill Kaprizov | 203 | 114 | 120 | 234 |
Jason Robertson | 207 | 104 | 129 | 233 |
Kyle Connor | 217 | 104 | 119 | 223 |
Brad Marchand | 196 | 82 | 134 | 216 |
Patrick Kane | 207 | 62 | 153 | 215 |
Jake Guentzel | 210 | 99 | 115 | 214 |
William Nylander | 214 | 91 | 118 | 209 |
Alex Ovechkin | 195 | 116 | 91 | 207 |
Alex DeBrincat | 216 | 100 | 100 | 200 |
Kevin Fiala | 201 | 76 | 121 | 197 |
Pavel Buchnevich | 190 | 76 | 115 | 191 |
Claude Giroux | 211 | 72 | 115 | 187 |
Brady Tkachuk | 217 | 82 | 104 | 186 |
Clayton Keller | 205 | 79 | 105 | 184 |
Nikita Kucherov | 129 | 55 | 127 | 182 |
Mats Zuccarello | 190 | 57 | 124 | 181 |
Oh I love Karlsson. I am championing him in every thread I can.Too funny
A decade huh?
How many 100 Point defenders out there?
Erik Karlsson is going to be 34 next season making $11.5m, and has been often injured. Before last year he had negative value with retention, at least now SJ has a chance to move him. Nylander is 28 with a $7m cap hit, in his prime, and has never been injured his entire career. It's not even close.Too funny
A decade huh?
How many 100 Point defenders out there?
Honestly, with Karlsson 50% retained I wouldn't give up more than a 1st round pick. And SJ would have to take Murray and Brodie back in the deal to make the money work.Well,if it's so easy then trade him to a team where it make at least some sense to
Then get back to us about acquiring Karlsson. Prospects and picks. It starts with Knies and a 1st
There are posts in this thread suggesting SJ will not be retaining on EK. I LOOK at his previous 4 seasons before I look at last yearDid you read any of this thread before regurgitating that premise or just out for an afternoon troll?
Holy one of the worst takes I've ever seenHe's also worth a lot more than Nylander.
I suppose it all depends on what's being offered. I've seen many people suggest the Sharks will have to retain 50% in order to get anything decent in return.There are posts in this thread suggesting SJ will not be retaining on EK. I LOOK at his previous 4 seasons before I look at last year
There are posts in this thread suggesting SJ will not be retaining on EK. I LOOK at his previous 4 seasons before I look at last year