What's going on with ice time? only 10 minutes last game, 14 the previous game, 11 the previous game.
We're all noticing an improvement in his game but he's still not getting his ice time?
I think that's reasonable? Sandy/Chabot are clearly the top two LD and should be getting a lot of ice time.What's going on with ice time? only 10 minutes last game, 14 the previous game, 11 the previous game.
We're all noticing an improvement in his game but he's still not getting his ice time?
Zero special teams is part of it. Last two games had a ton of special team play.What's going on with ice time? only 10 minutes last game, 14 the previous game, 11 the previous game.
We're all noticing an improvement in his game but he's still not getting his ice time?
Tastes good.love seeing people eating crow on Bran
Sanderson only got 2:20 more EV TOI than Brannstrom. Special teams is the difference.Zero special teams is part of it. Last two games had a ton of special team play.
He's also competing for icetime with Sanderson and Chabot who are no slouches themselves.
I think that's reasonable? Sandy/Chabot are clearly the top two LD and should be getting a lot of ice time.
Branny has been great on rushes, but his defending is still bad any way you look at it. If he was 6'2 200lbs different story.
His size is a detriment to him being a better version of himself but I’ll take Brannstrom at 5’8 over Ben Harpur or Patrick Weircioch who were easier to play against. I think everyone would agree Brannstrom playing his game at 6’2” 215 would be better but I wouldn’t take a bigger player just because he is bigger. When Klevin is here is 2 years, assuming he develops into a capable 3rd pair D, then we may have a debate about which style is needed on this team.Lmao and people tell me he's not getting shit on anymore because of his size.
Brannstrom has been very solid at both ends of the ice, I don't know what you're watching but I guess the size bias will never go away for some of you.
His size is a detriment to him being a better version of himself but I’ll take Brannstrom at 5’8 over Ben Harpur or Patrick Weircioch who were easier to play against. I think everyone would agree Brannstrom playing his game at 6’2” 215 would be better but I wouldn’t take a bigger player just because he is bigger. When Klevin is here is 2 years, assuming he develops into a capable 3rd pair D, then we may have a debate about which style is needed on this team.
He was on for the 1 goal but that was chaotic and the puck just kept bouncing and led to an almost lucky shot.I think that's reasonable? Sandy/Chabot are clearly the top two LD and should be getting a lot of ice time.
Branny has been great on rushes, but his defending is still bad any way you look at it. If he was 6'2 200lbs different story.
What? I am a big Branny supporter but that is just the truth.
I've never been a big Branny detractor around here. I think lots of want him to work out mainly because we traded our best player at the time for him.Lmao and people tell me he's not getting shit on anymore because of his size.
Brannstrom has been very solid at both ends of the ice, I don't know what you're watching but I guess the size bias will never go away for some of you.
He was on for the 1 goal but that was chaotic and the puck just kept bouncing and led to an almost lucky shot.
Other than that he has really learned to absorb hits without getting tattooed and then move the puck. When he gets 0 PK or PP time I would understand it is harder to be consistent 5v5 as well. Those long breaks aren't easy to take and then be full speed.
He is an important part of the back-end and if anything both Holden and Hamonic have been having their struggles.
What? I am a big Branny supporter but that is just the truth.
In sports size matters - if he was the same player but bigger he would be better. Near to the top of the league better really.
Actually, I think Chabot deserves some of the blame for leaving Brann defending a brief 2 on 1 situation.
Go to 1:05
Actually, I think Chabot deserves some of the blame for leaving Brann defending a brief 2 on 1 situation.
Go to 1:05
Well ya but once that happens then it's up to the defender left to make the play.
Wasn't blaming Brann anyway, I stated it was a bouncing puck and oddball play.
If Branny was that size he'd be Hedman!.. lol.His size is a detriment to him being a better version of himself but I’ll take Brannstrom at 5’8 over Ben Harpur or Patrick Weircioch who were easier to play against. I think everyone would agree Brannstrom playing his game at 6’2” 215 would be better but I wouldn’t take a bigger player just because he is bigger. When Klevin is here is 2 years, assuming he develops into a capable 3rd pair D, then we may have a debate about which style is needed on this team.
His defending is better than Chabot's. Much better.I think that's reasonable? Sandy/Chabot are clearly the top two LD and should be getting a lot of ice time.
Branny has been great on rushes, but his defending is still bad any way you look at it. If he was 6'2 200lbs different story.
To respond to this. Last game after the first goal they absolutely shredded him lmao. They almost never ever single out guys on goals against. On that first goal they just droned on and on about how poor brannstrom played it.Haven’t listened to anything on the radio lately. Are Dean and Gord still ripping into him every time he touches the puck?
His defending has been good this year.I think that's reasonable? Sandy/Chabot are clearly the top two LD and should be getting a lot of ice time.
Branny has been great on rushes, but his defending is still bad any way you look at it. If he was 6'2 200lbs different story.
Seems obvious that certain elements of defending rely on strength and added size would help in that regard. Lots of young defenders get better defensively as they add strength. Won't turn him into Hedman though...Why would
His size make a difference? If he was bad at defence at this size he would be bad at defence at any other size.
Brannstrom's biggest weaknesses are getting beat wide and failing to box out in front of the net. Neither of these struggles are due to him making the wrong decision or reacting badly to the play... it's because those are physical elements of the game and he is one of the smallest players in the league. I actually think his reads are quite good, but his size limits what he can do, even if his read is perfect.Why would His size make a difference? If he was bad at defence at this size he would be bad at defence at any other size.