Mata
Registered User
- Mar 4, 2019
- 1,764
- 1,009
For what it’s worth… I think Pekarcik might’ve been a better option. A player who could have a similar impact to Misiak in the OHL while being a year younger and therefore able to return for another season.
However, Pekarcik’s agency has a couple teams they want to send their top players to every year. They have Lysell, Honzek, Lekkerimäki, Vikman and Titlbach, who all went to Vancouver. They have De Luca and Kral, who went to Spokane. They also have Adam Sykora, who was drafted 1st overall last year and just stayed home, because Medicine Hat isn’t among the teams his agency sends players to.
So yes, Pekarcik might’ve been a better option. But if he doesn’t report, wouldn’t you rather have Misiak instead?
And after that, there really aren’t many players at the same level who are also likely to report.
I think it's pretty obvious, Erie wanted him for a short term goal/reason. One can subjectively debate whether or not it is the right pick or wrong pick and at the end of the day, our opinions don't really matter because we aren't making the calls.
Does Brown suck, yes.
Is Misiak likely picked because Stan had goals he needs/wants to meet, yes.
Is he likely to report and thus the reason for the pick, regardless of age, yes.
Would any of the so called "better players" reported? Unknown, but we have to assume if there were higher ranked players willing to report and younger, Erie would have been all over it. There is a reason they went with Misiak and we don't have to be privy as to why.
Was there a better pick? Unless you're picking Connor McDavid, there is almost always a subjective pick who COULD be better for any number of reasons.
As far as I'm concerned, Erie did what they believed to be the right choice (whether anyone agrees or not) and if people are continually unhappy, they can just unfollow the team and save themselves a lot of frustration and no one will bat an eye.