Im hoping he’ll be closer to a Leks for usIs he our next lukas vejdemo?
I'm hoping he'll be better than a Lehks for us. I see Heineman as a potential Anderson + on the left side, with better D and boasting the same attributes; physicality, speed and a shot that can fool NHL Gs.Im hoping he’ll be closer to a Leks for us
I'm hoping he'll be better than a Lehks for us. I see Heineman as a potential Anderson + on the left side, with better D and boasting the same attributes; physicality, speed and a shot that can fool NHL Gs.
In fact, if we were able to land a power forward LW (Dubois?) to play with Suzuki and Caufield, I could see a legion of doom line of Heineman - Dach - Anderson.
If we pick top-5 in 2023, I see that C pivoting a line with Farrell on LW and Roy on RW.
Heineman is as likely to be a top 6er as Mysak and much less than Roy and FarrelSlafkovsky, Dach, Dubois, Heineman, Anderson, and a big Centre if they don't get Bedard, would be a team very hard to play against. Especially if some of the big defense prospects turn out.
That's what she saidTheres also nothing hard about Dach
I knew that was coming lmaoThat's what she said
Haha couldn't resistI knew that was coming lmao
Fukc, yeah, I somehow lost Slafkovsky in the shuffle there. lmao!So you see Slafkovsky on 4th line? If your lines is Dubois-Suzuki-Caufield, Heineman-Dach-Anderson and Farrell-Top5 2023-Roy.
FWIW it was an ENG.
Dach is not a physical player, but he retrieves pucks and creates turnovers defensively, nonetheless and can gain the O-zone through center ice with his speed (not his physical play).Heineman is as likely to be a top 6er as Mysak and much less than Roy and Farrel
Theres also nothing hard about Dach
Fukc, yeah, I somehow lost Slafkovsky in the shuffle there. lmao!
No, I wouldn't put him on a 4th line with Beck and Ylonen.
I'd have Slafkovsky in Farrell's spot, Farrell in Heineman's spot and Heineman on a 4th line with Beck and Ylonen, or Mesar on a line with Slafkovsky and Dvorsky and fares on Dach's LW with Roy on the RW.
I'd move Anderson for a RHD and play Heineman with beck and Ylonen on the 4th line.
These "floaters" have contracts that are hard to get rid of. Armia could be traded for picks or players who have two way contracts. Heineman has already stated that it 's the Habs or his Swedish team next season. No Laval....keep forgetting we have him...hopefully, he makes the team and puts some pressure on some of the useless floaters we've collected in the Bargain Bin Era...
I do agree. It always worries me when a Finn or Swede has the option and chooses to resign over there.SHL is a mistake. If he went to Laval he could get called up and secure a roster spot. Not to mention getting acclimated to Montreal and the players.
I'm sure it's a mostly a money thing.I do agree. It always worries me when a Finn or Swede has the option and chooses to resign over there.
Does he have the option? I thought the new transfer agreement between the NHL and Sweden states that only 1st round players can be assigned to the AHL, and others can't until they are 24 years old?I do agree. It always worries me when a Finn or Swede has the option and chooses to resign over there.
SHL is a mistake. If he went to Laval he could get called up and secure a roster spot. Not to mention getting acclimated to Montreal and the players.