veganbruin
Registered User
He needs to produce but I would say he’s one of the few players with a high enough give a shit meter so far. I’m less worried about him than I am Zadorov.
The Bruins were spoiled by Chara, Bergeron, Krejci & Marchand all obliterating normal NHL aging curves. Having 1 guy like that is special but having FOUR on the same team is something I don't think we'll see again for a long time.“Rob Vollman summarizes this quite well in his book Stat Shot: The Ultimate Guide to Hockey Analytics: “Most players hit their peak age by age 24 or 25 then decline gradually until age 30, at which point their performance can begin to tumble more noticeably with the risk of absolute collapse by age 34 or 35.”
A New Look at Aging Curves for NHL Skaters (part 1)
How do NHL players age? When do they peak? How quickly do they decline? Questions about player aging in the NHL have been debated for years, and an incredible amount of research has already been do…hockey-graphs.com
I'd like to see a study like this done for elite players only. Take out the 3rd and 4th liners, the guys who really can't afford to lose anything. I'm sure you still see a decline but I bet it's much more gradual and they maintain a high level into their 30's.“Rob Vollman summarizes this quite well in his book Stat Shot: The Ultimate Guide to Hockey Analytics: “Most players hit their peak age by age 24 or 25 then decline gradually until age 30, at which point their performance can begin to tumble more noticeably with the risk of absolute collapse by age 34 or 35.”
A New Look at Aging Curves for NHL Skaters (part 1)
How do NHL players age? When do they peak? How quickly do they decline? Questions about player aging in the NHL have been debated for years, and an incredible amount of research has already been do…hockey-graphs.com
I'd like to see a study like this done for elite players only. Take out the 3rd and 4th liners, the guys who really can't afford to lose anything. I'm sure you still see a decline but I bet it's much more gradual and they maintain a high level into their 30's.
It'd be interesting to see it along side the cumulative decrease salary cap commitment as a % of the growing cap year on year too.They did sort of attempt to do this by figuring in only the top players 390 players forwards and 210 defenseman in TOI but that's still an awful lot more than what you're looking for. Their data window is a bit limited, with the study only looking at an 8 year window. The guts of the study though are pretty extensive, I just wish they had expanded their window a bit more.
Hyperbol I presume.!!What a great shift (assist to Detroit calling time out allowing him to have the energy/stay out) last 1:22 of 6 on 4 pulled goalie
Won clean draw to start that Zadarov sent down ice & killed play on wall and cleared zone to end it
He’s gotta bury a few more but his D game is there with Bergeron
Hyperbol I presume.!!
If not, I don't see him at Bergeron D game level
When you don’t have a one or two, this what happens. You overpay out of necessity. I think he’s a two. He’s not a bad player. No way they can just sign a first line center in this league without breaking the bank. None are coming up anytime soon.Hes still a ghost to me. Ghost is not necessarily awful, it just means he doesn’t do anything glaring bad or glaringly good so you never notice him on the ice. Fact is though he signed a lucrative contract to be a number one center and he needs to provide more glaringly good games. So hopefully more to come, but not surprised by anyone that has their reservations about him.
He's doing alright, wins draws and has a 200 ft game as advertised. His offense will come around. $7.5 M isn't much of an overpay for what he is skillwise...a second line centre.
His effort has been good and his defensive game has been very good, but that's not enough. To my eyes, Charlie Coyle has been more noticeable offensively. At least Coyle tries to create his own scoring chances.
It feels like one of the reasons we're struggling is because we brought Lindholm in to improve the top6 and so far, he hasn't done that.
If I'm the coach, I go back to what worked last year; Zacha-Pasta we've already done, Marchand-Coyle is up next. I put Lindholm at 3c where he should be an upgrade over what we had last year and it gives him some time to see if he can get his offensive game going. That's what Vancouver did with him last year.
He's been centering Marchand and Brazzeau. The captain is only now starting to look like he's back from injury and Brazzeau's a tweezer who's been a pleasant surprise. I'd give them time to work it out, particularly only 5 games in to their new coach.His effort has been good and his defensive game has been very good, but that's not enough. To my eyes, Charlie Coyle has been more noticeable offensively. At least Coyle tries to create his own scoring chances.
It feels like one of the reasons we're struggling is because we brought Lindholm in to improve the top6 and so far, he hasn't done that.
If I'm the coach, I go back to what worked last year; Zacha-Pasta we've already done, Marchand-Coyle is up next. I put Lindholm at 3c where he should be an upgrade over what we had last year and it gives him some time to see if he can get his offensive game going. That's what Vancouver did with him last year.
desperate times called for desperate measures. the GM was desperate to keep this "window" open (and to save his job, legacy, whatever).His effort has been good and his defensive game has been very good, but that's not enough. To my eyes, Charlie Coyle has been more noticeable offensively. At least Coyle tries to create his own scoring chances.
It feels like one of the reasons we're struggling is because we brought Lindholm in to improve the top6 and so far, he hasn't done that.
If I'm the coach, I go back to what worked last year; Zacha-Pasta we've already done, Marchand-Coyle is up next. I put Lindholm at 3c where he should be an upgrade over what we had last year and it gives him some time to see if he can get his offensive game going. That's what Vancouver did with him last year.
I think he'll be fine if we can move some of the country club vets and give the team a new identity.At 2.5 this guy would be great.
As it is he’s going to be absolutely despised by this fan base over the next couple of years until he is bought out.
What an absolutely brutal signing.
f*** you Sweeney
Don’t forget the Dman they paid big bucks for to be a third pairing anchor whose main job is apparently to keep the penalty box guy company.I don’t think management would let this happen at this juncture.
That’s an immediate inditement on their pro scouting ability if we signed an almost 8m per year forward to be a 3C.