jetsforever
Registered User
- Dec 14, 2013
- 28,289
- 25,096
NHL 3rd Star of the Week!
Grubauer of Avalanche, Colorado hospital employee NHL First Stars of Week
Grubauer of Avalanche, Colorado hospital employee NHL First Stars of Week
That is a flaming hot take.
I like Ehlers. He's fast and has a great shot. But pure talent? I'd take Scheifele over him for pure talent. Scheifle's puck handling, forechecking, take-aways, passing and shot are all skills. Ehlers is faster, so that's one for him.Except if you have other C options. Then you can ignore position and go for pure talent. That is Ehlers.
Realistically though, you aren't likely to be able to ignore position.
I'm surprised there's any question, really. Ehlers is playing the best hockey I've seen him play, I'll give him that. Other than skating, Scheifele is as good or better than Ehlers in any other skill category I can think of. And it's not that Scheifele is a bad skater (other than he still gets knocked down easily, then again so does Ehlers), it's that Nik's speed and agility are in the top half percent of the NHL.Mark Scheifele is the superior player. I think Nik has been fantastic this year and taken a real step forward. However, 55 is a centre, and he produces ridiculously consistently despite the toughest matchups. He plays against the elite forwards from the other team, and always gets their top D pair.
I once thought it would be ok to trade Ehlers but thank god that never happened. He is truly a special player that leverages his speed and agility, vision and that laser of a shot. However, Mark Scheifele is still the guy I'm taking if I have to pick one or the other. That should be the true measure of a players value.
I like Ehlers. He's fast and has a great shot. But pure talent? I'd take Scheifele over him for pure talent. Scheifle's puck handling, forechecking, take-aways, passing and shot are all skills. Ehlers is faster, so that's one for him.
...but really, does it matter which one is better as long as they're both on our team?
Nobody is saying anything negative about Ehlers. I think he's a legitimate star in this league. I think Scheifele has more skills, that's all. I'm pleased that we have both of them, as well as several other players right now.Ehlers has more than speed. Watch him carry the puck with his head up all the time. Watch him make zone exits and entries. Etc. Things influenced by size and strength, I'll give you Scheifele, everything else I think Ehlers takes it. But it may depend on how you define talent/skill.
Panarin guy is pretty good I hear.Well to be fair he did come from Columbus...
Nobody is saying anything negative about Ehlers. I think he's a legitimate star in this league. I think Scheifele has more skills, that's all. I'm pleased that we have both of them, as well as several other players right now.
Then put Ehlers at Center and see if he has Schiefele's playmaking, vision or decision making ability. My main knock with Ehlers is his decision making and the fact that he plays like a sports car without breaks. That's better for a winger than a center.I didn't use the word skill. I said talent. Talent is in the genes. Skills are learned.
That said, I like Ehlers skills better too, for the most part. But that may be bias talking. I'm not knocking Scheifele's skills in any way. But Scheifele being the 1C is what pushes the needle in his favour. Consider them both as wingers and how do they compare? Still close, but Ehlers' skating gives him the edge now, IMO.
Anyone surprised?
This is actually a very important statement, much more so than a silly who is better argument.
To me, it says that PLD recognizes Ehlers' natural gifts and therefore, as his C, will do his best to allow him to reach his potential. It's a completely different mindset than was the case when Nikolaj played with Laine and will serve them, and the team, well.
i can't even count how many debates i've gotten where ppl were telling me how ehlers just enters the zone and does nothing
some how doing nothing leads to leading the team in a variety of stats....you know the stuff that measures doing something....
This is actually a very important statement, much more so than a silly who is better argument.
To me, it says that PLD recognizes Ehlers' natural gifts and therefore, as his C, will do his best to allow him to reach his potential. It's a completely different mindset than was the case when Nikolaj played with Laine and will serve them, and the team, well.
Yep. Sometimes I suspect the same people who wept in their cornflakes when Hot Mess Brendan Lemieux got traded.
If Ehlers is really "doing nothing" then he does nothing better than all but a handful of players in the league.
I don’t agree that his decision making ability is flawed at all, I think he has learned well to slow down once he enters the O zone and more often than not makes the right choice, be it pass or shoot.Then put Ehlers at Center and see if he has Schiefele's playmaking, vision or decision making ability. My main knock with Ehlers is his decision making and the fact that he plays like a sports car without breaks. That's better for a winger than a center.
As far as skills and talent are concerned, I use both words interchangeably. I guess you could say that Ehlers has more "natural athletic ability", mainly because it takes more than practice to skate the way he does.
Still, I like 'em both. For historical reference, Phil Esposito wasn't fast, didn't shoot particularly hard and didn't have the highlight-reel hands, but his vision, hockey sense and accuracy made him a dominant NHL legend. The minors are full of guys with more skill and talent than a lot of players who've managed to find steady work in the NHL.
Although his decision to curl up and a slap shot from the blue line was silly.I don’t agree that his decision making ability is flawed at all, I think he has learned well to slow down once he enters the O zone and more often than not makes the right choice, be it pass or shoot.
The sports car without brakes as an analogy might have worked a few seasons ago - But I don’t think it fits anymore.
Also think his passing has been top notch the last few seasons.
These are points I am making without getting into the argument of who is more talented - A subject that I am undecided upon.
Morning media availability:
I believe the tweet I responded to was quoting the interview above, which I then checked. PLD actually called Nik " one of the most talented players" he's played with, which is still high praise, but more realistic.Is there a quote about Nik from PLD? I can’t seem to access it?
Or at least say "That's what happens when you shoot the @$#% puck!!!"Missed the post-game talk so this seemed the most relevant place for this comment.
I'm thinking that I'm not the only one who was hoping that after the OT winner he would have skated right to the bench and screamed at 55/26 "That's how you play a two on one you dickheads!"
________________________________________________
... I question [Roslovic's] passion and intensity for the game.
Good on Ehlers for getting the game winner but let’s not forget 10 seconds before he scored it he blew a defensive zone coverage and Hellebuyck bailed him out and the jets easily could have lost that game because of Ehlers.
For sure. Did you listen to his interview after? He thought he played a bad game.