- Jan 13, 2023
- 942
- 1,566
Canucks are only getting worse from here on out.And it's true. Too bad the Canucks couldn't ride their pixie dust any further. You'll see the fall next season. Just wait.
Canucks are only getting worse from here on out.And it's true. Too bad the Canucks couldn't ride their pixie dust any further. You'll see the fall next season. Just wait.
Their GM is aggressive though. They are likely losing Zadorov and Lindholm but they are in on Necas already.Canucks are only getting worse from here on out.
I'm fine with embracing some humility on the circumstances but I don't get this "third string goalie" point so many people make. Demko would not have been any better. He is still ranked ahead, because of consistency over time, but thats not a measure for a single series. Silovs was brilliant in the series and at the very least turned DeSmith into the third stringer. It's an insult to Silovs to make goaltending one of the reasons the Canucks lost.First of all I agree that Oilers deserved to win as they did push the play for most of the series. However I'd probably chill with the bravado of beating them with their 3rd string goalie and taking game 7 by a goal. Oilers are a bounce or two from losing the series themselves even though they played better. Good luck moving forward hope we see a great series as it's been so far.
Silvos played great and we didn't lose because of him. However in my opinion the Canucks would have played with more confidence in front of Demko and not "cheated" to stay in a more defensive structure in front of the rookie. Regardless Oilers played better and deserved to win.I'm fine with embracing some humility on the circumstances but I don't get this "third string goalie" point so many people make. Demko would not have been any better. He is still ranked ahead, because of consistency over time, but thats not a measure for a single series. Silovs was brilliant in the series and at the very least turned DeSmith into the third stringer. It's an insult to Silovs to make goaltending one of the reasons the Canucks lost.
nurse needs to work on his trash talk, sounds way too polite hereZadorov and Joshua all talk, scared of heavyweight tilting!
To show Hughes and Pettersson what courage and heart looks like. Unfortunately for the Nucks, they never learned that lesson.Why would anyone want to take Nurse off the ice?
Its funny watching Calgarys junk spread around the league and get hyped ( Zadorov and Tanev)Wow Z is scared shitless. I'm not suprised though, he didn't back his shit up in the BoA series either.
Gazdic was bleeding, that time of month, deucebag.Funny watching gazdic call it like he sees it.
I’m sure his response had nothing to do with all the Canucks fans in his DMsGazdic was bleeding, that time of month, deucebag.
Demko is better than .898.I'm fine with embracing some humility on the circumstances but I don't get this "third string goalie" point so many people make. Demko would not have been any better. He is still ranked ahead, because of consistency over time, but thats not a measure for a single series. Silovs was brilliant in the series and at the very least turned DeSmith into the third stringer. It's an insult to Silovs to make goaltending one of the reasons the Canucks lost.
Go watch the entire series highlites. Not guaranteed. This isn't a video game. Silovs made some insane saves that series. Youtube has a mini movie the NHL made of the entire series. I watched it and forgot some of the gigantic saves he made.Demko is better than .898.
What a cunning post
Gazdic would have gotten caved fighting from 1975-2005. And his skills were barely ECHL. 8 points in 200 games and got his his ass beat most nights.
Gazdic got his ass beat most nights?Demko is better than .898.
What a cunning post
Gazdic would have gotten caved fighting from 1975-2005. And his skills were barely ECHL. 8 points in 200 games and got his his ass beat most nights.
I would never bet against Jim Rutherford.Canucks are only getting worse from here on out.
Must've went to the Laraque School of Trash Talk. that guy is so politenurse needs to work on his trash talk, sounds way too polite here
Silovs played very well under the circumstances but he is not Demko. I think Demko would have made a difference on a goal or two.I'm fine with embracing some humility on the circumstances but I don't get this "third string goalie" point so many people make. Demko would not have been any better. He is still ranked ahead, because of consistency over time, but thats not a measure for a single series. Silovs was brilliant in the series and at the very least turned DeSmith into the third stringer. It's an insult to Silovs to make goaltending one of the reasons the Canucks lost.
Mcdavid has been hurt all year. Kane and Drai are beat up too. Sure we aer lucky in the sense that no one has missed games, but still beat up.Oilers were the overall better team and deserved to win. You are now on a roll but it does need to be stated that the Oilers have also have been blessed with remarkably good injury luck in these playoffs.
If Edmonton had silovs that series, it's a fast series. Skinner rebounded against Dallas, but he needed to be yanked and have a reset.Mcdavid has been hurt all year. Kane and Drai are beat up too. Sure we aer lucky in the sense that no one has missed games, but still beat up.
Long way of saying I don't think Demko would have tipped the balance of the series. The Canucks still lose that series with demko. I don't get why Vancouver fans downplay how well Silovs played.
Oh yeah. I forgot the oilers had the flu during the Vancouver series.If Edmonton had silovs that series, it's a fast series. Skinner rebounded against Dallas, but he needed to be yanked and have a reset.
Nevermind Henrique being out and ekholm, drai, McDavid either banged up or sick. Kane's been banged up all playoffs
Vancouver for most of the year took leads in games then sat back. Edmonton had a lead a ton in this series. Blew alot as well
As I said Silovs had a save % of 8.98. That is not Thatcher Demko level goaltending.Mcdavid has been hurt all year. Kane and Drai are beat up too. Sure we aer lucky in the sense that no one has missed games, but still beat up.
Long way of saying I don't think Demko would have tipped the balance of the series. The Canucks still lose that series with demko. I don't get why Vancouver fans downplay how well Silovs played.
You cannot just assume demko would have made a lot of those epic saves silovs made. That's now how it works. Maybe he stops others silovs let's in, but it's not just this black and whiteAs I said Silovs had a save % of 8.98. That is not Thatcher Demko level goaltending.
Lol spare me on the claims of McDavid and Draisitil being so hurt. They are so hurt they play 28 minutes every game. Laughable.
Every team has multiple players with bumps and bruises. That IS the playoffs. The Oilers have had zero all star level players miss a single game in these playoffs like the Canucks and Stars have. Your players are not missing any games.
Again, you don't get to play the injury card on players who are so hurt they are on the ice 28 minutes a night. So hurt they lead the NHL in playoff scoring and ice time of any forwards.If Edmonton had silovs that series, it's a fast series. Skinner rebounded against Dallas, but he needed to be yanked and have a reset.
Nevermind Henrique being out and ekholm, drai, McDavid either banged up or sick. Kane's been banged up all playoffs
Vancouver for most of the year took leads in games then sat back. Edmonton had a lead a ton in this series. Blew alot as well
The Oilers have a history of opening up good goalies though. Oettinger had his worst stretch vs the Oilers, and that's after playing against Vegas and Colorado, the two previous cup winners. The Oilers play very defensively with low shots and have had quick strike offense, and of course great special teams. Silovs didn't even get to play all of the Nashville series. I don't think Bobrovsky will have a great save percentage either, but he will play greatSilovs played very well under the circumstances but he is not Demko. I think Demko would have made a difference on a goal or two.
Silov's save % was 8.98 for the playoffs. Demko would not have been under 9. He played this year at a 918 clip and is very consistent and cool in the net. Small margins matter in a playoff series with 6 one goal games in a 7 game series.
I am not saying goaltending was the reason the Canucks lost the series. Silovs was fine. They lost because they didnt generate enough shots on Skinner, who was shaky for much of the series, and because their power play couldn't score and the Oilers PP did.
But to suggest there is no difference in Silovs and Demko is inaccurate. There is not a Canuck fan that would not like a crack at the Oilers in a 7 game series with our all star goalie in net. It was one area where the Canucks have a clear advantage over the Oilers. Also would have liked to have our top goal scorer for game 7.
Oilers were the overall better team and deserved to win. You are now on a roll but it does need to be stated that the Oilers have also have been blessed with remarkably good injury luck in these playoffs.
I think Vancouver just ran out of gas don't care who they had in game 7 they looked atrocious. They wake up after that oiler giveaway. Nothing before. Game 6 sameAgain, you don't get to play the injury card on players who are so hurt they are on the ice 28 minutes a night. So hurt they lead the NHL in playoff scoring and ice time of any forwards.
When players are not in your line up for crucial games, then you actually have an injury problem.
A few games without one 34 year old bottom 6 player you picked up at the deadline doesn't really move the needle.