- Sep 28, 2007
- 6,246
- 307
No, he is genuinely good or at the very least his shot is excellent.
Reminds me a bit of PK Subban.
His shot is up there, yes. But so far he hasn't been challenged at all. Comparing him to PK Subban is way overboard.
No, he is genuinely good or at the very least his shot is excellent.
Reminds me a bit of PK Subban.
I don't care how badly I get flamed for this, but Lundqvist's rebound control is awful.
90% of the goals scored against him are rebounds.
I don't care how badly I get flamed for this, but Lundqvist's rebound control is awful.
90% of the goals scored against him are rebounds.
I'll tell you what though.
Krug is exactly the type of Dman the Rangers need on their blueline. A guy whose first instinct is to the shoot from the points.
Honestly, I'm beginning to think that Del Z's playmaking skillset isn't as needed on our blueline.
I don't care how badly I get flamed for this, but Lundqvist's rebound control is awful.
90% of the goals scored against him are rebounds.
A lot of you should have been alive for Guy Hebert and Mike Dunham years.
Well, what do you expect. The Jackets have sucked for a while, so it would make sense that their fans wouldn't know too much about how good or successful a player is.
Krug reminds me of Marek Zidlicky. Also a little of Erik Karlsson, but the two aren't comparable, Karlsson is worlds better.
He's gonna be good, but not this good.
Krug is good because he can skate and mainly because he can shoot and shoot accurately. All of our defenseman shoot and have no idea where it's going and they take too long to decide to shoot. Krug gets the puck, or receives a one timer, and instantly fires and he hits the net.
With Torts there, he would never play because defensemen are not permitted to play like that for Torts. Besides, he would not have gone through the process yet. He would play a guy like Hamrlik instead.
His shot is up there, yes. But so far he hasn't been challenged at all. Comparing him to PK Subban is way overboard.
The problem is, when he's playing well, the rebounds are partially due to the mass pileup right in front of the net, like on the 2nd goal. The way our D collapses is a double edged sword.