KnightofBoston
Registered User
Sorry, just don't see how a team can get that close to the Cup and blame the GM for not winning it all.
Seems to make a lot more sense to praise the GM for putting together a team that had a very real chance to win Cup.
matt barkowski and wade redden?
kaspars daugavins?
of course they made it to the finals, they still had the same core that got them there two years earlier. But, those wins relied on some insane luck, hockey is often a game of bounces and the team that can apply consistent pressure and capitalize on chances wins the day. So yes, I blame chia because he should have identified what was needed for this club and taken the next step. He just threw darts at the board and thought "well, we did in 2011 soooo"....was enough and it clearly wasn't.
bad depth players and role players, chicago not so much. That ended up being the difference
that team very nearly completely choked to a far inferior team in toronto and only by the absolute sheer will of lucic and bergeron did we end up winning, they then rode that win through the rangers, sparked also by an upcoming krug, pittsburgh was all rask and team defense, but I think they were overrated. Chicago was a really good example of our flaws being highlighted. Flaws Chia then tried to cover up for only for the team to bow out to an inferior team in montreal. Many on here, including myself at the time, and Im an optimist, felt iffy about our defense having redden and bartkowski in the top 6. It was always a hope they'd play to their potential and or ceiling. Chia actually struggled mightily to fill out the D corps for years, even going back to the cup win, Kaberle was the best he could do and while the man put up lots of apples, if that was his best that really says a lot about his worst. Now im getting flash backs of corvo and zanon, how dare you do this to me Dennis