Doesn't cost muchI agree without him on the PK this would have never saw game seven
Doesn't cost muchI agree without him on the PK this would have never saw game seven
No one is saying put an asterisk. But there is no shame in acknowledging that they had a very easy path and wouldn't have beaten Tampa and probably wouldn't have beaten Washington.
No. Same one. Top seed vs the lowest seed. Team didn't show up. Simple.
Well with the eight teams that qualified in the east all getting over 100 points,it’s definitely not a given,have to expect Islanders to have a better season this year also .Hate telling you this but if they stay the course and Bergy retires the 2023 playoffs aren't guaranteed.
Ok I will go on believing 2019 was a terrible wasted opportunity,you that it wasn’t,we’re both entitled to our opinions,and neither one of us will change the others opinions,so why continue to argue about it.Lol
I don't care for Jacobs and don't believe he cares about hockey.Sad but true...for the ownership it's all about the money
Lets agree to disagreeWasted opportunity? They wasted a chance to win a Game 7 at home where they had last change.
Had they gotten past Toronto only to lose to CBJ then yeah maybe it was a wasted opportunity. But that isn't what happened.
Yep that is why depth comes in line... saying the contrary is simple dumb imo. 37 and 63 is the reason it got to game 7. 7 th game Bergeron and the first line has 1 goal +1 and missed a couple of opportunity. Stay on your agenda boys!Not really. Staal's job wasn't to score so looking at his points is silly. His job was to limit Bergeron. Just look at the home and away differences to see the results. Ignoring that obvious factor is............dumber.
unfortunate but way too many players simply didn`t contribute on the scoresheet when needed. Beaten by, IMO, the better team, Carolina was the team I feared most in one of our polls here, our boys extended it further than I anticipated they would. Not gonna yakk away on Bergy, Biggest off season moves has to be addressing the absence of grit and physicality on this roster, they simply have 0 nasty left
Watching a beanpole like Kotkaniemi and Svechnikov throwing their weight around like they were Lindros, our boys? Sure at times, not nearly enough
I`ll get bashed here for this but rooting for Carolina to win, the kind of team that if wearing Spoked B jersey`s we`d all be pumped about, young, fun, physical, fast....
It's the end folks. Say goodbye to the remnants of the 2011 cup core.
That is my point... Canes rolled 4 lines and 3 of them were good. Our third line wee on the ice for three Canes goal on breakdown and bad D coverage. First line was + 2 yesterday while no goals and major D breakdown D coverage from especially line 2 and 3.It's total bullshit. All it means is that the Bruins had no other center.
Staal did his job better than Charlie Coyle, I'll give him that.
Swayman was the only positive. ImoEach defensive pair was on for a goal against. But all 3 goals scored with Coyle's line on. Cassidy obviously tried to hide them, but nothing worked.
Hall, Pasta, Fred & Nosek were particularly terrible, Smith not too far ahead of them.
Was the best defensive play of the night McAvoy going behind the Canes net to cut off Debrusk's rush?
Good experience for Swayman.
Only goals from D for B's came from Forbort & Clifton.
Was Slavin the difference? Led Canes in scoring (2-6-8) and plus/minus (+10)
This loss was on the third line man we’re they brutal,what the hell happened to the 2019 playoffs Coyle I guess it must have been his line mates or something.Yep that is why depth comes in line... saying the contrary is simple dumb imo. 37 and 63 is the reason it got to game 7. 7 th game Bergeron and the first line has 1 goal +1 and missed a couple of opportunity. Stay on your agenda boys!
agree. Alot of lack of respect for the guy here, blessing agenda to say how Boston stinks losing to him. Some posters feeds themselves being negative!Raanta is a very good goalie who has had problems staying healthy. There is a reason we had trouble scoring on him.
It's a sport game, we win as a team and lose so. Maybe the Canes depth was simply better and we loss because of that. That said I am proud of the Bruins. They won 3 games against the Canes who alot here thought the Bruins would be an embarrassment.This loss was on the third line man we’re they brutal,what the hell happened to the 2019 playoffs Coyle I guess it must have been his line mates or something.
He was lights out especially in the first periods in Carolina he never let the Bruins get the first goal ,I don’t know may have preferred Freddy in net he has a tendency to let in some bad goals at terrible times in a game.agree. Alot of lack of respect for the guy here, blessing agenda to say how Boston stinks losing to him. Some posters feeds themselves being negative!
It's a sport game, we win as a team and lose so. Maybe the Canes depth was simply better and we loss because of that. That said I am proud of the Bruins. They won 3 games against the Canes who alot here thought the Bruins would be an embarrassment.
I am not sure what is more hilarious.i'd like the team to flush out some of its players but suspect it'll be just more of the same - no changes with players or management.
Ya, this one is far down my list... except if that was Bergeron's last game.As far as heartbreaking game 7 losses at least this doesn't come anywhere close to St Louis 2019. Or even Montreal 2014, Philly 2010, Carolina 2009. This one sucks but is on par with the 2008 where it just sucks
Here are the main needs on this team assuming Bergeron comes back.
1-A new GM
2-A new coach
3-A number 1 center
4-A number 1 or 2 RW with aggression and size who can score 20 goals and create space
5-A top 4 D who is not passive and will hit
6-A depth D with same qualities
7-A third line W with speed
8-A third line wing who is aggressive with size
9-A tough 4th liner. Keegan Kolesar, Nick Deslauriers or someone like them.
10-Depth in Providence that can step in when injuries occur and fill some of the rolls listed above. Either veteran AHL players or prospects
Besides this things look great....
...oh and as always a new owner but at this point I just hope I outlive Jacobs
I'm not putting an asterisk on it, but don't pretend the Bruins had a hard road to the Cup in 2019. The Bruins got all the breaks to make it to the Cup finals that year.So tired of everyone discounting the Bruins trip to the finals. The Lightning beat the Canadiens in the ****ing cup for cryin out loud...Where is their asterisk? The year before they won because the season got pushed back and Hedman (who would have missed the playoffs) was able to get healthy? Where is the asterisk? The Devils were a 6 seed and the Rangers a 5 seed with 96 points, where is the Kings asterisk?
Ridiculous.
Perfect summary.They did show up, Carolina is just better and snuffed them out. I do agree they let down and sulked for a stretch it seemed.
As for not beating Tampa, they crushed the team that beat Tampa.
'19 was a choke job, on the players and coaches. The Blues wanted it more, played an old school cross the line style and the Bruins at times had no answer. The Bruins won two games on the road in convincing fashion when Blues players were out with suspensions. They were also out coached by a large margin.
I think ultimately, the Canes have a lineup that is a) capable of playing balls to the wall hockey and b) EVERY player buys in, if you aren`t willing to play that way, you don`t playThat is my point... Canes rolled 4 lines and 3 of them were good. Our third line wee on the ice for three Canes goal on breakdown and bad D coverage. First line was + 2 yesterday while no goals and major D breakdown D coverage from especially line 2 and 3.
Agree. And Canes took advantage of Boston breakdowns. Before blaming a player for mistakes, I will give credit to the team executing. Canes team has more depth and that is where it was played, they are in your face team and Slavin was a monster on D. As per health, imo ALL teams have their issue on the matter.I think ultimately, the Canes have a lineup that is a) capable of playing balls to the wall hockey and b) EVERY player buys in, if you aren`t willing to play that way, you don`t play
Now, before I start hammering all those Bruins who I think played well below standards I think it`s wise for me to wait to see what was ailing them but that said, even if all were 110% healthy, can`t speak the same about this lineup up and down as you can about the Canes
If I were Bergeron I’d be telling who ever is in charge, my return would be contingent on Sweeney and Cassidy’s employment being terminated.If Bergeron is gone, please clear house with management. I really do not want to watch Sweeney rebuild another team and not do I want to see Cassidy coach that team.
Cassidy and Sweeney’s tenure should be tied to however long Bergeron wants to stay around
He was the unsung hero of the Bruins blueline. He earned every penny and more, of his contract.I would keep Forbort. He was excellent.