bennysflyers16
Registered User
- Jan 26, 2004
- 86,039
- 64,319
Aside from the PP, he was practically flawless.PROVOROV???
Are they insane?
G had one in the third, but missed the net. That's it.And so, we scored a goal. Does anyone actually remember a single chance the Flyers had that felt dangerous? I don't. Not a single one. The goal was fluky as hell. Sure, I'll take it, but this team needs to get its act together in a hurry.
OFFICIAL THREE STARS:
- Hart
- Provorov
- Weber
love Provy, but he literally gave up a mini 2-on-0 in the final minuteAside from the PP, he was practically flawless.
I actually agree that it was a "goof" idea.Grant on the PP, they actually thought this was a goof idea
Couts invisible
Giroux invisible
Voracek whatever
Hayes bad
Laughton bad
Konecny bad
I saw a defenseman who played it simple instead of getting exposed each and every time he's on the ice. When Ghost has the puck in the corner my heartrate is comparable to a breakaway on Bryz. What was he, minus-5 last game?Unsure what you were seeing. But tragically, at this stage I keep HAgg over Niskanen
They woke up in the middle of the third period.
You really don't get that the problem isn't effort? Really?this team is up 2-1 despite looking stale as f***
quit being stubborn and mix it up.
Was not happy with the overall effort. After getting your shit pushed in, I expect high energy the next game. Didn't really have that response. I get that the ultimate response is winning the next game, but I would've liked to have seen more fire.
It gets a 2 yr 3mm extensionCouturier was a beast tonight. A dog on the puck.
Sanheim & Myers are carrying our blueline.
Carter was Carter.
Free TK from Hayes, please. I've seen enough.
Thompson & Grant are a disgrace as expected.
Laughts was also a disgrace. I'll be expecting much publicity of those facts from the mainstream Flyers media. Hell, Morgan Frost had a bad practice and Meltzer Tweeted about it. What does 75 turnovers by Scott Laughton get?
Provorov had to carry the deadweight corpse of Niskanen around all night.
Unpopular opinion but it's according to my eyes.
This game was fuc*ing boring, yeah, we weren't good, we can be better and we should be better, yeah.
But we weren't worse than Habs overally. This game was just about battles around boards and we were fifty-fifty there. It was about defense mistakes and if we don't count Laughton's turnovers, we were very solid around Hart.
xGF overally: PHI 1.9 - MTL 1.58
But yeah, our lines and PP must be fixed for game 4.
Carter! Hart!
I disagree.. COuts worked hard, drove the net and took punishment was good on PK.Couts invisible
Giroux invisible
Voracek whatever
Hayes bad
Laughton bad
Konecny bad
Defensively they were solid all game but they started to take over the pace of the game in the third which is whats been missing.Thought they were good all game and the numbers back it up..but the 3rd they did have some real spark.