Zil
Shrug
- Feb 9, 2006
- 5,559
- 43
I still think that Moore is better than MDZ
Why don't you lower the bar a little more for him?
I still think that Moore is better than MDZ
They have him competition of a 38 year old. Sounds like they very much think he will be contributing soon.
Explain, please...
Why don't you lower the bar a little more for him?
Explain what? You think a 38 year old on a two year deal is going to keep mcilrath in the ahl? Lol
I think McIrath will keep himself in the AHL.
And when/if McIrath actually demonstrates that he can play at the NHL level on a consistent basis, the 38 year old on a two year deal will be one of the last to go to make room for him.
What I fail to see is how the Rangers signing Boyle is an endorsement of McIrath.
I think McIrath will keep himself in the AHL.
And when/if McIrath actually demonstrates that he can play at the NHL level on a consistent basis, the 38 year old on a two year deal will be one of the last to go to make room for him.
What I fail to see is how the Rangers signing Boyle is an endorsement of McIrath.
Don't compare a young third pairing d man to a young third pairing d man?
Del Zotto at this point is a train wreck. Saying Moore is better than Del Zotto is saying that he's capable of playing without spontaneously combusting on the ice. It's an accomplishment in the barest of senses.
Del Zotto at this point is a train wreck. Saying Moore is better than Del Zotto is saying that he's capable of playing without spontaneously combusting on the ice. It's an accomplishment in the barest of senses.
If the rangers felt mcilrath was far off, they would have kept stralman for 5 years instead of signing Boyle for 2.
Why don't you lower the bar a little more for him?
I fail to see the correlation.
I think he will have a very solid 14 -17 year career, that is setting it rather high, no?
I'm failing to see how you don't see it.
Great add to the conversation!
So the Rangers feel he's close because they signed a guy to two years instead of a guy for five? Yeah, don't see the correlation.
I don't know that it indicates that he's "close," but it definitely indicates that they have players in mind who they feel are likely to step into the role in 2016-17. It doesn't even necessarily have to be McIlrath they're thinking about.
Great add to the conversation!!!
So the Rangers feel he's close because they signed a guy to two years instead of a guy for five? Yeah, don't see the correlation.
You think he's going to last that long as a third pairing guy? Or do you actually believe he has top four potential?
Top 4 potential, no doubt, but he will be in this league for a long time just on skating ability alone. Even if he doesn't pan out, a third pairing d-man with wheels like his is a pretty sought after commodity
He really doesn't skate that we'll to be honest. He's not terrible but I wouldn't call his skating an asset.
Basing his career on his skating isn't sound logic.
His potential is for a Brooks orpick type guy and his low end is Eric cairns.