Archie Lee
Registered User
- Apr 13, 2018
- 564
- 607
I don’t think Goldman does a deep dive into the why, but my take is that the underlying reason is that post-2022/2023 we asked our young players to start playing a more complete game without properly supporting them with veterans who can assist. Thus we have a group of kids, Cozens at the fore-front, who have next to no on-ice support. The defence are talented, but largely one dimensional and young. Same for the top-9 forwards. Thus far, the efforts to get Cozens’s game going have amounted to trying him with different wingers who are younger than him. Goldman suggests that giving Cozens a veteran winger who plays a heavy forecheck and can take care of the physical side of the game would help him; also a defensive Defenceman could help.Ive been wanting to do a littler evaluation of some of these stats along side the eye test.
Does the article hypothesize the reason for the dropoff, or does it simply state that his numbers got worse?
I really think analytics in hockey is interesting, but feel like sometimes a lot of the popular people in this domain are content to pretty much say "x player got better/worse based on y metric" and sort of leave it there instead of trying to figure out why
Cozens, like all of our young players, was asked to do too much too soon without the needed veteran support. His game is collapsing under the weight of unreasonable expectations.