Dumba hit on Pavelski

ThatGuy22

Registered User
Oct 11, 2011
10,801
4,471
The head snaps back before any body contact is made so the head was the first and primary point of contact. The body contact rule is supposed to cover cases where there is shoulder to chest or body to chest contact and the force of that collision propels the player into the head contact. That's not what happened here, Under the Shanahan version of DOPS this would have rightly been given a significant suspension.

Under Parros the rule was reinterpreted so that hitting the head is ok so long as you get the body afterwards, which is stupid dangerous wrt concussions. It doesn't matter if it's stupid, and dangerous it's how the NHL does it now so I don't think there will be any consequences other than players with brain injuries that is.
Your wrong or lying. I cant speak to your motivations. The head being so close to the torso as long as contact is followed through the body it's been deemed clean. Has been for a decade. Dozens of examples, that led to threads like this because people don't understand the rules.

Players hunch forward when they skate, it's the nature of the biz.
 

bov

Registered User
Nov 13, 2010
7,440
3,629
Good hit, shoulder to shoulder. I'm surprised that Pavelski didnt seem to anticipate contact there. Guys finish checks every single game just as late, if not later, and I don't see this as a blindside hit.
 

GreatSaveEssensa

The Dark Side Of The Goon
Feb 16, 2016
3,753
6,066
Manitoba
I was pumped for the playoffs.

But that non call just reminded me of the prehistoric mentality still prevailing in the NHL, even among fans, about the way head shots and concussions should be considered. Just say "playoffs hockey" and suddenly testosterone and caveman violence matter more than health, life and death.

I closed my TV right after that call. This nonsense is slowly pushing me away from hockey.
And then you went immediately to an NHL hockey forum? It sure pushed you far I see
 

Steerpike

We are never give up
Feb 15, 2014
1,795
1,750
Colorado
One thing I absolutely despise is when analysts watch something in super slow-mo and then go: "oh yeah, the puck is looooonnng gone."

IT'S SLOW MO. THAT'S HOW SLOW MO WORKS. YOU CAN'T BASE YOUR IMPRESSION OF INTENT OR THE SPEED AT WHICH SOMETHING HAPPENED BY WATCHING SLOW MOTION VIDEO.
 

Shocker

Registered User
Dec 20, 2019
2,078
3,824
I don't like Dumba, but that's at max a 2min penalty with an unfortunate outcome.

Reminded me of the Sharks-Vegas fall Pavelski had and pretty sure it's the reason why we have reviews for majors now.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Colt.45Orr

mouser

Business of Hockey
Jul 13, 2006
29,630
13,147
South Mountain
So many posts saying the hit was late.

All the good video angles I’ve seen have been in slowmo. From my eye the distance between the players between the time the puck was released and Dumba hits Pavelski could have been within the window where Pavelski was still legal to be hit.

Has anyone done a timer or frame count to confirm the hit was actually late?
 

Ovi895

Registered User
Feb 24, 2023
863
740
Probably not the hit you want to make when you're a one man team and your one man just came back from injury himself
 
  • Like
Reactions: teal

jonlin

Registered User
Nov 11, 2011
6,091
5,978
A hit that late should always be a major. You cant expect to be rammed like that without the puck. If this is legal and clean according to some fans, then hitting unexpecting players outside the play is ok.
 
  • Like
Reactions: karltonian

Teppo

Registered User
Mar 3, 2008
2,431
403
Probably not the hit you want to make when you're a one man team and your one man just came back from injury himself
How did that team do in the 13 games where their "one man" wasn't playing?
 

Garbo Man

Meh
Oct 15, 2017
5,702
6,985
Sherwood Park
The worst part about the hit was the fact that(and it's unfortunate that this happened) 2 separate sticks(Pavelski's and someone else's, not Dumba's) hit him right in the side of the head which is probably a big reason why he's out before he hits the ice. Might be SLIGHTLY late but nothing more than a 2 for Interference. Right call would be to reduce it to 2min, and you hate to see it but it's just an unfortunate result
 
  • Like
Reactions: Obvious Fabertism

TaLoN

Red 5 standing by
May 30, 2010
51,454
25,244
Farmington, MN
Does this draw attention from the league? Called a 5 min major. Edit: They reviewed and called this back as 2 for roughing




Clean. They even reviewed it on the ice and deemed it clean. ESPN's ref on the broadcast deemed it clean.

Welcome to the playoffs. It's a man's game
 

Stubu

Registered User
Dec 16, 2015
4,097
4,758
F.
The very worst case scenario, this was Pavelski's last NHL game. He sure deserves a better send off.
 
  • Like
Reactions: antman12

Ad

Upcoming events

Ad

Ad