MuckOG
Registered User
- May 18, 2012
- 15,889
- 5,882
It was a legal body check, with an unfortunate injury resulting when Pavelski's head hit the ice. Whats your point?OK.
What does that have to do with anything I've said?
It was a legal body check, with an unfortunate injury resulting when Pavelski's head hit the ice. Whats your point?OK.
What does that have to do with anything I've said?
Apparently, Dumba hit him like this:OK.
What does that have to do with anything I've said?
One skate is on the ice. The one he is using to pushoff of into the hit.
Analysis.It was a legal hit, with an unfortunate injury resulting when Pavelski's head hit the ice. Whats your point?
Kinda, and timed perfectly.Apparently, Dumba hit him like this:
My neutral opinion, the issue with the hit is that the puck has already left and should have been an interference major penalty as he doesn't have the puck with him. The whole original purpose of making a body check is to separate the puck from the man and the puck is not even in his possession. Dumba should have been made example so that others know what is acceptable and what is not. This is a perfect example. This is more of a headhunting targeted hit which should have been made illegal, imo. The big issue is that the league need to do more to protect their own players from this concussion issues and if the league doesn't protect their own players then it is on them. They need to step in, imo.
I am not watching a playoff game until the NHL fixes this issue and all they talk but no actions. Their talks are cheap. I haven't had watched the playoffs for years now. If the Canucks are in, I'd watch but not other teams. I have had a sour taste in hockey since Sharks series in 2014. I used to be a fan of letting them play. Then I realize, what's good if a team won the game undeserved? I have changed my mind on this ever since.The NHL has allowed guys to finish their checks since the dawn of time. Watch a game and see how many hits are on guys who just recently got rid of the puck.
It's pretty simple, this hit on Kaprisov, and Wild fans would be singing a different tune.
Hell, they thought this was a dirty hit and were calling for his head.
I love the absurdness of this board sometimes.You're right. The Scheifele hit was an actual hockey play to prevent a goal and a play where the offensive player willingly put themselves in a bad position.
I am not watching a playoff game until the NHL fixes this issue and all they talk but no actions. Their talks are cheap. I haven't had watched the playoffs for years now. If the Canucks are in, I'd watch but not other teams. I have had a sour taste in hockey since Sharks series in 2014. I used to be a fan of letting them play. Then I realize, what's good if a team won the game undeserved? I have changed my mind on this ever since.
He stopped skating well before the hit. It was borderline at worst. Evans had a responsibility to not put himself in a bad spot.I love the absurdness of this board sometimes.
Look up the definition for charging... you're welcome.
Apparently... I mean it is even in the rules on how finishing checks is considered legal if the puck isn't there... they define the window and everything.What issue? Checking?
If you're not watching any playoffs why are you here?
Dumba maybe took 1 stride into him, that’s not charging.Dumba had no intention of playing the puck and had him lined up for days- which is charging. But it seems like that penalty is hardly ever called anymore. They used to mention it in those videos they would put out a couple years ago for player suspensions (Player took X strides, etc.). I would argue it was a "predatory" hit, which is also a word they used to throw around a lot, and would like to have seen a major penalty assessed but that may be exclusive to targeting the head.
Roughing doesn't make sense; it seems like they just made something up because they didn't know what to call it and forgot charging exists.
Not a Dumba fan but that should not have been a penalty.
Dumba had no intention of playing the puck and had him lined up for days- which is charging. But it seems like that penalty is hardly ever called anymore. They used to mention it in those videos they would put out a couple years ago for player suspensions (Player took X strides, etc.). I would argue it was a "predatory" hit, which is also a word they used to throw around a lot, and would like to have seen a major penalty assessed but that may be exclusive to targeting the head.
Roughing doesn't make sense; it seems like they just made something up because they didn't know what to call it and forgot charging exists.
Sportsnet has a good video on the hit, showing how Pavelski gets whacked hard in the head by his own stick as it gets wedged between him and Dumba. Reminds me of that Hall on MacKinnon hit some time ago where the stick did the most damage.