1. It’s been said by those that know him and see him work that he is energetic, influential, and not a push over.
2. It has been said by those inside the organisation, the old dogs themselves, that he has the respect of the experienced staff. Babcock said “he is a superstar” and “he is decades smarter than I am”
I think the bigger question is will he have the respect of the fan base and media?
It shouldn’t matter but it does in terms of longevity in the position.
If he’s making moves with “moneyball” in mind, the stats he will use will likely be proprietary and not publicly available. Performance, health metrics and other variables.
If he makes an unpopular move, he can’t provide his rationale.
And if it doesn’t immediately pay off, that’s a recipe for a roast.
He’s got a VERY tough set of circumstances