kp61c
Registered User
They would be mad not to take it. Dumb proposal.Would Drouin @ 50% for Namestnikov and a 3rd get it done?
They would be mad not to take it. Dumb proposal.Would Drouin @ 50% for Namestnikov and a 3rd get it done?
They would be mad not to take it. Dumb propisal.
They would be mad not to take it. Dumb proposal.
They have already retained 2.5M on the Dadonov deal. Can you continue to retain on players without a limit?
Don't be obtuse. A typo means dumb and hence the irony? Or you are not so Pejorative Slured and meant something else?Even funnier! lol
YesDon't be obtuse. A typo means dumb and hence the irony? Or you are not so Pejorative Slured and meant something else?
Wow what a sell job You'd make a great agentHe's an NHL calibre player who can fill in at center and can play both sides in any top 6. He can contribute in the right circumstances. He was never much of a scorer but the hockey sense is still there. He can be a threat especially on the PP so it makes him useful come playoff time. It looks like Hughes prefers projects over mid or late round picks and a defenseman or goalie who needs a fresh start might do the trick.
I phrased my answer poorly. I should have said that teams have 3 retention slots and a slot remains in use until the contract associated with it.So what if a player has 5 years remaining in his deal and is traded with retention. Does the retaining team only retain for 3 years?
Drouin is still to score his first goal this season. He is not an upgrade over Namestnikov.Dumb? The cost for retaining that much alone is worth a 4th. The difference between a 3rd and a 4th is not that much, worth the risk of Drouin being a marginal upgrade over Namestnikov. Now, the conversion on if Drouin is the right player is a whole other story, but this is under the pretext that there's nobody else left on the market we can afford.
I don't see an impact to stick handling or passing, but his shot is gone.Watching Drouin in Montreal, my sense is his wrist injuries have affected his stick handling and he's not the same player.
But for sure it's worth a try in a market where the media and the fans aren't constantly hounding you. He had to take time off because he couldn't sleep due to the stress.
would you?Drouin at 2.75 , someone should take a try, even a club not in the playoffs
This. Nobody has any illusions of Drouin magically fulfilling his draft day potential. But maybe we could get him back to 40 points or so, which would be well worth it from our end. And if it doesn't work, well, it's not like Namestnikov was working out either. Not really a loss.Dumb? The cost for retaining that much alone is worth a 4th. The difference between a 3rd and a 4th is not that much, worth the risk of Drouin being a marginal upgrade over Namestnikov. Now, the conversion on if Drouin is the right player is a whole other story, but this is under the pretext that there's nobody else left on the market we can afford.
I'm still surprised Hughes managed to trade Dadonov. Perhaps this approach might also work with Drouin .Ziltch , Nada , Zero
Wow what a sell job You'd make a great agent
Yeah he's gutlessDrouin has zero goals this season. What a pathetic performance. 36 games. 0 goals. -16. That’s his contract year we’re talking about. What a joke of a player.