GDT: Draft Day Bonanza - All rumors/speculation/draft talk here ( Poll Added!)

  • PLEASE check any bookmark on all devices. IF you see a link pointing to mandatory.com DELETE it Please use this URL https://forums.hfboards.com/

Who do we take with the 9th OV tonight?


  • Total voters
    171
  • Poll closed .
Status
Not open for further replies.

Kaapo Cabana

Next name: Admiral Kakkbar
Sep 5, 2014
5,093
4,299
Philadelphia

200.webp
 
  • Like
Reactions: Rangers in 7

Nopuckluck

Registered User
Dec 29, 2017
1,319
710
Spending a day listening to NHL Network Radio, the take I consistently heard was that Tkachuk’s has as high a ceiling as anyone in this draft. Physically he’s got the frame to be a monster. His skill set is being drastically underrated by his critics here.

If he’s the Rangers’ target, I’m good.
We all should be
 

NYR Viper

Registered User
Sep 9, 2007
47,699
18,079
Jacksonville, FL
As an aside, isn't Hank, Robin Lehner's idol? Would he consider signing with the Rangers to work with Allaire for a year and get ~20-25 games prior to the deadline with the idea being that he would be dealt after straightening out his game?
 
  • Like
Reactions: bernmeister

Glen Sathers Cigar

Sather 4 Ever
Feb 4, 2013
16,683
20,724
New York
I'm going to be positive about who we take at 9. I'll be happy with any of the players projected to go in that range, even preferences aside. None of these guys are bad picks.

Wahlstrom
Tkachuk
Dobson
Bouchard
Boqvist
Kotkaniemi
Farabee
Smith


These are all good players and will be one of our best prospects. Even if I have a preference for one over another, any one of these picks will be a good pick.

So everyone try and remain calm and positive. Don't overreact if we take Bouchard and you really wanted Boqvist and he was available for instance.
 

True Blue

Registered User
Feb 27, 2002
30,092
8,362
Visit site
Zadina from what I understand is the type of player who is good both offensively and defensively. I have seen Hossa's name thrown out as the style he plays for Zadina. In saying that, I'd have Zadina over Tkachuk if both were avaialble at 7 and the Rangers traded up. Not to the point that I'd be pissed if they took Tkachuk but my list would be:
Zadina
Tkachuk
Wahlstrom

Mainly because I don't see many pundits or people calling Wahlstrom the type of player who effects the game if he isn't scoring.
I concur
 
  • Like
Reactions: Rangers in 7

Good Intentions

Registered User
Mar 30, 2018
2,106
1,853
Wahl razor and edge trimmer, marketing potential for Wahlstrom in New York.

Six hours to go. A flight to the west coast. Three movies. Almost. There.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Rangers in 7

GeorgeKaplan

Registered User
Dec 19, 2011
9,094
8,376
New Jersey
No you don't and I'm not explaining myself again about it...

@GeorgeKaplan @GregSirico A little help here, lolol
Late to this and haven’t read the last 3 pages, but the idea of taking a guy who’s going to take a while to refine just what his game is and is most likely going to be an anchor by age 28-29-30 with #9 doesn’t sit all that well with me with what else would be available
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Ad

Upcoming events

Ad

Ad