I’ve been posting that Zadina will be a bust for over 6 months
I’ve been posting that Zadina will be a bust for over 6 months
It would be bigger than the meltdown when Vilardi wasn't selected.
Wahlstrom's goal-scoring ability is probably slightly higher, Zadina's ability as an all-around offensive player is higher. But both guys are incredibly talented.
Personally, I like Zadina better by a fairly noticeable margin and think he would arguably be more the most naturally talented forward drafted by the Rangers in 27 years --- with Cherepanov being the only real challenger to the team's post-Kovalev drafts.
Having said that, if I didn't think they were likely to go with a center, I'd even dare say that Montreal taking Wahlstrom wouldn't "shock" me from a talent, value or decision standpoint.
The gap might not be huge, but I think it’s there. My feeling is that Zadina can be more of an offense driver than WahlstromI've alluded to this before, but I don't think there's as much of a gap between Zadina and Wahlstrom as the last few months of lists have led people to believe. They both have 35+ goal scoring upside and if you look at it from that perspective, which one of them has the oh-so-coveted RH shot?
Now, Zadina dropping to 9 seems a bit extreme, but someone jumping on Wahlstrom? Could possibly see that.
I can definitely see that, and I agree for the most part. The weird thing is that I'm very comfortable putting Zadina high on my list, but there's just something about him that doesn't sit right with me. I've been trying all year to figure it out, but I just get this feeling of dread when I picture him putting on a Rangers sweater.
I’ll say this from Fantasy land: if Ottawa keeps their pick this year and Colorado has a better year than last year and end up getting the 1st OA or even a top 3 pick next draft, I don’t know if there would be a team more primed at the top of the draft to trade that pick for established playersWas listening to NHL Network Radio this morning during my 90 minute commute to work. One of the guys that Stelleck and Simmer had on was talking about Ottawa giving the 4th overall pick to Colorado. The theory is to start fresh, don't have this hanging over your head and could you really live with yourself if Ottawa wins the lottery next year and has to give up Jack Hughes?
In all honesty, if I am Pierre Dorion, I have to at least be considering it. Ottawa won't be any better next year. Matt Duchene wanted to go to a contender. He will likely be pouting through the season as Ottawa proves to be a joke of a franchise (ownership/GM wise) - I do feel bad for their fans, they deserve better. Karlsson will likely be traded. I doubt Hoffman has a good year next year with all this crap hanging over his head. Anderson is 37, he can't carry the team anymore. Ottawa will be hilariously bad, like less than 50 points bad. They will still have a top 4 pick next year. Give 2018 to Colorado.
I’ve been posting that Zadina will be a bust for over 6 months
..... care to share why?
I can't remember who it was, but they have this person on their show a lot. I don't know that it is fantasy land. I've seen people say Jack Hughes is going to be anywhere from Matthews to McDavid.I’ll say this from Fantasy land: if Ottawa keeps their pick this year and Colorado has a better year than last year and end up getting the 1st OA or even a top 3 pick next draft, I don’t know if there would be a team more primed at the top of the draft to trade that pick for established players
Either way, I just realized Ottawa doesn’t have a second or third round pick this year, so I feel like they’re more than likely going to keep this year’s pick and do what they can in the next year or so to try to trade to get the pick backI can't remember who it was, but they have this person on their show a lot. I don't know that it is fantasy land. I've seen people say Jack Hughes is going to be anywhere from Matthews to McDavid.
This year has been a disaster for the Sens. Move on from this year. Give Colorado the pick. Tank next year for Hughes.
If Colorado gets Hughes, they won't be trading that pick. If it is another top-5 pick then yes, likely will be traded.
Zadina, ridiculously good shot.
That's all I have on him.
Nothing outside his shot is worth mentioning.
One trick pony, but one nice trick that every team could use. But again, red flags allover with a one trick pony in the top ten.
I definitely disagree with all of thisZadina, ridiculously good shot.
That's all I have on him.
Nothing outside his shot is worth mentioning.
One trick pony, but one nice trick that every team could use. But again, red flags allover with a one trick pony in the top ten.
I really like the Hossa comparison I see out there every now and thenI'll respectively disagree on this one --- big time.
Zadina is unique in the sense that he plays all three zones and is much better defensively than you'd expect an offensive forward to be.
He's surprisingly a three zone, pretty darn complete player. I'm almost surprised it isn't mentioned more often that it is. If he were a center, people would be really hyping the two-way play.
I'm also curious to see how he performs with better talent around him. Because I don't know if he was necessarily surrounded by talent that completely maximized his abilities.
If I were being nitpicky, I'd probably argue that Wahlstrom is more of the one trick pony of this top ten.
I definitely disagree with all of this
Sounds like Eeli Tolvanen going into his draftZadina, ridiculously good shot.
That's all I have on him.
Nothing outside his shot is worth mentioning.
One trick pony, but one nice trick that every team could use. But again, red flags allover with a one trick pony in the top ten.