WheresRamziAbid
Registered User
- Oct 31, 2013
- 8,352
- 2,982
Yeah, adding teams as "should have been top 8" is subjective.
But my point is every single one winner could be seen coming. There's been no surprise or underdog winners for a long time.
And as such, I disagree there are plenty of teams who should be listed as contenders. There's a short list of contenders - probably about 6 most years - and a bunch of pretenders there to make up the numbers. The pretenders can have wonderful runs but actually win it? Nah.
As things stand, Washington are not in the contender list.
I think the margins of what were talking about is small enough that a bit of revisionist history creeping in effects our opinions here. So i looked for whatever data i could find.
Its not perfect but i found the preaeason futures odds for the cup finalists going back to 2014. Which, again, while not perfect analysis does give a good snap shot of public perception going into the season and since this discussion started with preseason perception of this years Capitals i think is fair.
There have been 26 teams that have made the cup finals:
12 from the top 4
7 from 5-8 (16 total top 6)
7 from 9+
So in total approx 62% of finalist do come from that “favorites” top 6 that you mention but that still leaves 38% of finalist outside that group with almost 25% coming outside the top 10.
Again id like to reiterate preseason odds arent exactly a science but i think it highlights my argument that there are plenty of teams with a legitimate chance to contend


