WTFMAN99
Registered User
- Jun 17, 2009
- 33,889
- 11,991
Maybe you should educate yourself on why your offer is profoundly stupid and nonsensical and only benefits the Leafs. I didn't say Nylander doesn't have value, it's the rest of the pile of crap that you included that is a joke. My example was to reiterate how silly you suggestion was.
So the Kings will get rid of one of the best defensemen in the game, the one player who makes their blueline as strong as it is, a player capable of playing half a game, for a forward and a bunch of scraps? Yeah, I'm sure an undersized Carrick who averages about 16 minutes is going to balance things out. Oh better yet, they really could use a useless healthy scratch as well. That'll really convince the Kings to trade a Norris caliber defenseman with two Stanley Cups and two Olympic medals.
For the sake of sanity, I should probably refrain from providing any input in these silly discussions. Look at all the time Leafs fans wasted on their fantasy scenarios involving Steven Stamkos last summer. Now we get to witness the same stupidity with Doughty and any time an Ontario born player is about to become a UFA.
And yet the common denominator is that you love to appear in threads involving the Leafs.
Nylander is a great piece for the trade. A 1st round pick is a 1st round pick last time I checked and pretty much mandatory in any trade.
Carrick is a right handed shot and can play on the 2nd-3rd pairing for the Kings, age means he'll be apart of the team moving forward as the Kings transition.
Marincin/Marchenko - Cap balancers.
What else needs to be included? Maybe an extra 1st rounder or something. Certainly never seen a player return 2 players like Marner and Rielly in 1 deal.