For those comparing Melnyk and Andlauer, I would suggest basing their decision making on how they made their money. Melnyk was about creating new drugs from expired patents. Andlauer is about logistics. One requires making one smart decision, and repeating the process. The other is about making more efficient processes. It means constantly evaluating and improving to find an edge. I would say Melnyk's way of making money is more ingenious, but it doesn't lend itself to long-term improvement. Logistics on the other hand has no barrier to entry. Andlauer's going to have to constantly update his processes to fend off potential competitors.
Between the two and their different mindsets, who do you think is better suited to put together a winning hockey organization? The guy with one great idea, or the one who has to constantly re-evaluate to fend off competitors? The guy who said "lawyer up" to every decision he didn't like, or the guy who said we need to be better?