BruinDust
Registered User
- Aug 2, 2005
- 24,590
- 27,834
Also complaining about the uneven play of the roster. It's full of youngsters making mistakes.![]()
It's also full of veterans making mistakes as well.
Also complaining about the uneven play of the roster. It's full of youngsters making mistakes.![]()
Yeah, well, sometimes when you are the ACTUAL GM, and not some fan sitting at a keyboard criticizing with no actual repercussions, things take a little longer![]()
It's not about 'instant gratification' that's geriatrics yelling at the kids on their lawn.
It's seeing the direction and moves of the team and disagreeing. It's about seeing the moves made and not having faith. Even if some youngsters arrive next year, it will take a few years for them to develop and hit their peak. It's believing by the time the youth arrives, the core will be too old. Simply put, it's seeing the plan, seeing it's faults, and wanting something else.
But of course, anecdotes about watering lawn, growing potatoes, and renting movies from Blockbuster go over well with the group of fans who grew up during the depression.
The difference between you and I (not the only one I'm sure) is that I thought the B's current core was done the year they won the Prez Trophy, then lost in the first round. The youth that is arriving in the next few years (and the ones that are already here) will be the core of the next group. That's what I'm looking at.
Well back in August of 2014, I was calling the Bruins a potential bubble team to make the playoffs. http://hfboards.mandatory.com/showpost.php?p=88710961&postcount=172. So I don't think I overestimated the talent or the core on the team. Calling the Bruins a bubble team to make the playoffs that year after winning the Presidents Trophy wasn't really a popular or common opinion.
My fear is the Bruins remain mediocre and continue to tread water; Sweeney needs to make a deal to add a major talent. That was the point of getting the three first round picks to begin with, to move up and get Hanifin. Had he done that, I'd probably be singing his praises. Sports is a results based business and I am sure there are many GM's who could've been Sam Pollock if they got some of the trades they planned.
However, what I see now is the goal posts being moved. When Lucic and Hamilton were traded, plenty of posters called it a 'retool on the fly'. This was supposed to be a 2 year operation where the Bruins got some young talent to supplement the current core. However, if the goal is to build the new core, that is a full rebuild. If you think of this as a full rebuild, then all players from the old core should be open for trades. Even if locals think the Bruins can't afford to be irrelevant in the market, they are already becoming irrelevant with their play anyway.
I remember when everyone was calling for Chiarelli's head for his "evaluation process" Sweeney seems to have take the process to a whole other level. I think he might have some typos on his GM contact list or something because it sure has been a while since he has made a move of significance...
I`d agree more if I was watching a host of other teams wheeling and dealing but I`m not seeing that.
Too many here think making a deal, in spite of glaring holes that need to be filled is as simple as making one call
I`m not defending Sweeney, I haven`t liked all his moves but I can see the plan he has, it`s more about investing in the long term future of this team via strong drafting, from the D out and I like the crop of kids he and his scouts have chosen over their last 2 drafts.
I haven`t liked the Miller/Quaider contracts, Rinaldo etc...
The silence and/or spin next March will be enjoyable
I'm expecting lot of excuses and spin on being right
You guys as GMs would be lucky to not wrap up the first overall by Black Friday
I'm not sure I agree with the bolded's logic, ODAAT. How many other teams have failed to make the playoffs the past two years, have shown brutal lethargy and/or apathy from their players at times, had their owner make a declaration of a "deep playoff run", etc.?
Not all teams will feel the same motivation to make moves. The B's, IMHO, should be one of the more motivated teams to do so. Someone's got to pick up the phone and start the conversations, should be Sweeney.
It doesn't have a be a big move, maybe move an underperforming player for another team's underperforming player, and hope the change of scenery helps them both. Or one of the redundant defensemen for something. Or since the prospect pool is so deep, maybe they can ID some players that are more expendable from that list, and pair them with a pick or two for player that can help now; and I'm not thinking a rental vet, but a youngish player that will be here for a year or two.
Just because other teams aren't making moves, it doesn't make it acceptable for Sweeney to sit on his hands while a 3rd straight season (second under his watch) circles the drain.
I wang to hear the Negative Nancies blame Sweeney for assembling a tight team
Team plays tight at home?
Come spin boys let's hear it
And the young players are tight afraid to screw up
Yah Sweeney fault
The duration and size of the contracts to our old core goes directly against your theory, and is the main reason some of us are puzzled by the plan. surely as a gm your true core gets the bulk of the $. that's not what the next 4 years look like for us. I think your theory is sound if the choices we've seen back it up. but they don't.The difference between you and I (not the only one I'm sure) is that I thought the B's current core was done the year they won the Prez Trophy, then lost in the first round. The youth that is arriving in the next few years (and the ones that are already here) will be the core of the next group. That's what I'm looking at.
I realize Bob McKenzie teeeted out props for the Bruins doing the difficult task of retooling and trying to make playoffs but good to see the organization from Cam on down has the Bruins in the discussion as one of the couple of prospect laden teams in the game
A 95+ point team with those deep pockets impressive
Can't wait to see a top 6 on D
Lauzon- McAvoy
Krug-Carlo
O'Gara - Chiller
Move over 77 Canadiens
I realize Bob McKenzie teeeted out props for the Bruins doing the difficult task of retooling and trying to make playoffs but good to see the organization from Cam on down has the Bruins in the discussion as one of the couple of prospect laden teams in the game
A 95+ point team with those deep pockets impressive
Can't wait to see a top 6 on D
Lauzon- McAvoy
Krug-Carlo
O'Gara - Chiller
Move over 77 Canadiens
Some of those 70s Nova Scotia Voyageurs would have won a couple of rounds in the NHL.
I'm not sure I agree with the bolded's logic, ODAAT. How many other teams have failed to make the playoffs the past two years, have shown brutal lethargy and/or apathy from their players at times, had their owner make a declaration of a "deep playoff run", etc.?
Not all teams will feel the same motivation to make moves. The B's, IMHO, should be one of the more motivated teams to do so. Someone's got to pick up the phone and start the conversations, should be Sweeney.
It doesn't have a be a big move, maybe move an underperforming player for another team's underperforming player, and hope the change of scenery helps them both. Or one of the redundant defensemen for something. Or since the prospect pool is so deep, maybe they can ID some players that are more expendable from that list, and pair them with a pick or two for player that can help now; and I'm not thinking a rental vet, but a youngish player that will be here for a year or two.
Just because other teams aren't making moves, it doesn't make it acceptable for Sweeney to sit on his hands while a 3rd straight season (second under his watch) circles the drain.
The 81 Islanders and the 77 Canadiens were the most complete and talented teams I ever saw
They could dance like Astaire or fight like Ali
Well back in August of 2014, I was calling the Bruins a potential bubble team to make the playoffs. http://hfboards.mandatory.com/showpost.php?p=88710961&postcount=172. So I don't think I overestimated the talent or the core on the team. Calling the Bruins a bubble team to make the playoffs that year after winning the Presidents Trophy wasn't really a popular or common opinion.
My fear is the Bruins remain mediocre and continue to tread water; Sweeney needs to make a deal to add a major talent. That was the point of getting the three first round picks to begin with, to move up and get Hanifin. Had he done that, I'd probably be singing his praises. Sports is a results based business and I am sure there are many GM's who could've been Sam Pollock if they got some of the trades they planned.
However, what I see now is the goal posts being moved. When Lucic and Hamilton were traded, plenty of posters called it a 'retool on the fly'. This was supposed to be a 2 year operation where the Bruins got some young talent to supplement the current core. However, if the goal is to build the new core, that is a full rebuild. If you think of this as a full rebuild, then all players from the old core should be open for trades. Even if locals think the Bruins can't afford to be irrelevant in the market, they are already becoming irrelevant with their play anyway.
Surprised it took you this long to see that tweet and post it here.![]()