Does anyone want to talk about the Capitals...

Pavel Buchnevich

"Pavel Buchnevich The Fake"
Dec 8, 2013
60,185
26,908
New York
I think after last season you could’ve safely assumed that they weren’t that bad. Making the playoffs in Ovechkin’s worst season was a bigger accomplishment than they got credit for.

I think Carbery is proving himself to be one of the best young coaches in the league, if not the very best. So they have that going for them in a major way.

They are going to make the playoffs. They may even get a high seed. I don’t think I expect them to keep up their play to this extent, but I also don’t see them completely falling off and barely making the playoffs.

At the same time, my impression has been that while there has been some improvement with some of their key players like Strome, McMichael, Protas that these guys are way over performing a rational improvement curve from them. They are all shooting clear career highs and on pace for like 30-50 more points than previous career highs. Ovechkin was also shooting a clear career high that wasn’t very sustainable either.

I think they have a good team. I just think when you get to the playoffs and everything is erased that they probably don’t have the horses. They are probably getting a little lucky right now, even if they’re improved. They’ll probably see a regression as the season goes on. And I think when it matters that they won’t yet have the pieces to do more than maybe win a round (and that also looks questionable to me).

So I would say they’re probably like the 10th or so best team in the league this year, and I think that’s a clear improvement because they were 5-10 spots lower last season. They are moving in the right direction, but I don’t think there’s anything that would make me believe this is sustainable this season and that they’re a Cup contender. Asking too much of players that’ve essentially never proven it.
 

HTFN

Registered User
Feb 8, 2009
12,570
11,500
I think after last season you could’ve safely assumed that they weren’t that bad. Making the playoffs in Ovechkin’s worst season was a bigger accomplishment than they got credit for.

I think Carbery is proving himself to be one of the best young coaches in the league, if not the very best. So they have that going for them in a major way.

They are going to make the playoffs. They may even get a high seed. I don’t think I expect them to keep up their play to this extent, but I also don’t see them completely falling off and barely making the playoffs.

At the same time, my impression has been that while there has been some improvement with some of their key players like Strome, McMichael, Protas that these guys are way over performing a rational improvement curve from them. They are all shooting clear career highs and on pace for like 30-50 more points than previous career highs. Ovechkin was also shooting a clear career high that wasn’t very sustainable either.

I think they have a good team. I just think when you get to the playoffs and everything is erased that they probably don’t have the horses. They are probably getting a little lucky right now, even if they’re improved. They’ll probably see a regression as the season goes on. And I think when it matters that they won’t yet have the pieces to do more than maybe win a round (and that also looks questionable to me).

So I would say they’re probably like the 10th or so best team in the league this year, and I think that’s a clear improvement because they were 5-10 spots lower last season. They are moving in the right direction, but I don’t think there’s anything that would make me believe this is sustainable this season and that they’re a Cup contender. Asking too much of players that’ve essentially never proven it.
arguably the worst byproduct of the advanced stats age.

What is a rational improvement curve for a late-blooming 6'6" wing with hands? Are we just pacing with everyone's D+X years or are we watching players and deciding if this is sustainable with context?
 

Pavel Buchnevich

"Pavel Buchnevich The Fake"
Dec 8, 2013
60,185
26,908
New York
arguably the worst byproduct of the advanced stats age.

What is a rational improvement curve for a late-blooming 6'6" wing with hands? Are we just pacing with everyone's D+X years or are we watching players and deciding if this is sustainable with context?
Or it’s merely realistic.

It’s simply not realistic that all these players that have never shown a semblance of this all hit career highs by such a large margin. Players sometimes improve out of nowhere to a much higher tier of player. I can think of someone like William Karlsson or Jared McCann as prime examples. You might get 1 or 2 in the league per year. You don’t tend to get three on the same team in a season.
 

My3Sons

Nobody told me there'd be days like these...
Sponsor
Excellent coaching and buy in. They are playing complementary hockey and seem to be more than the sum of their parts. I think they may be on a bit of a shooting bender which may return to earth but they are fundamentally sound.
 

Fallschirmyager

Registered User
Jun 25, 2009
5,492
899
If the team that’s leading the league in scoring, goal differential, has the greatest goal scorer of all time, and is second in the nhl in win percentage is forgettable to you, maybe you should just admit to yourself that you don’t actually like hockey.

Or more likely they're placing higher standards on other teams than they do their own. What has been excitable about the team in their avatar in the last decade or so?
 

Ad

Upcoming events

Ad

Ad