Does anyone want to talk about the Capitals

Pavel Buchnevich

"Pavel Buchnevich The Fake"
Dec 8, 2013
60,185
26,909
New York
I think after last season you could’ve safely assumed that they weren’t that bad. Making the playoffs in Ovechkin’s worst season was a bigger accomplishment than they got credit for.

I think Carbery is proving himself to be one of the best young coaches in the league, if not the very best. So they have that going for them in a major way.

They are going to make the playoffs. They may even get a high seed. I don’t think I expect them to keep up their play to this extent, but I also don’t see them completely falling off and barely making the playoffs.

At the same time, my impression has been that while there has been some improvement with some of their key players like Strome, McMichael, Protas that these guys are way over performing a rational improvement curve from them. They are all shooting clear career highs and on pace for like 30-50 more points than previous career highs. Ovechkin was also shooting a clear career high that wasn’t very sustainable either.

I think they have a good team. I just think when you get to the playoffs and everything is erased that they probably don’t have the horses. They are probably getting a little lucky right now, even if they’re improved. They’ll probably see a regression as the season goes on. And I think when it matters that they won’t yet have the pieces to do more than maybe win a round (and that also looks questionable to me).

So I would say they’re probably like the 10th or so best team in the league this year, and I think that’s a clear improvement because they were 5-10 spots lower last season. They are moving in the right direction, but I don’t think there’s anything that would make me believe this is sustainable this season and that they’re a Cup contender. Asking too much of players that’ve essentially never proven it.
 

HTFN

Registered User
Feb 8, 2009
12,571
11,502
I think after last season you could’ve safely assumed that they weren’t that bad. Making the playoffs in Ovechkin’s worst season was a bigger accomplishment than they got credit for.

I think Carbery is proving himself to be one of the best young coaches in the league, if not the very best. So they have that going for them in a major way.

They are going to make the playoffs. They may even get a high seed. I don’t think I expect them to keep up their play to this extent, but I also don’t see them completely falling off and barely making the playoffs.

At the same time, my impression has been that while there has been some improvement with some of their key players like Strome, McMichael, Protas that these guys are way over performing a rational improvement curve from them. They are all shooting clear career highs and on pace for like 30-50 more points than previous career highs. Ovechkin was also shooting a clear career high that wasn’t very sustainable either.

I think they have a good team. I just think when you get to the playoffs and everything is erased that they probably don’t have the horses. They are probably getting a little lucky right now, even if they’re improved. They’ll probably see a regression as the season goes on. And I think when it matters that they won’t yet have the pieces to do more than maybe win a round (and that also looks questionable to me).

So I would say they’re probably like the 10th or so best team in the league this year, and I think that’s a clear improvement because they were 5-10 spots lower last season. They are moving in the right direction, but I don’t think there’s anything that would make me believe this is sustainable this season and that they’re a Cup contender. Asking too much of players that’ve essentially never proven it.
arguably the worst byproduct of the advanced stats age.

What is a rational improvement curve for a late-blooming 6'6" wing with hands? Are we just pacing with everyone's D+X years or are we watching players and deciding if this is sustainable with context?
 

Pavel Buchnevich

"Pavel Buchnevich The Fake"
Dec 8, 2013
60,185
26,909
New York
arguably the worst byproduct of the advanced stats age.

What is a rational improvement curve for a late-blooming 6'6" wing with hands? Are we just pacing with everyone's D+X years or are we watching players and deciding if this is sustainable with context?
Or it’s merely realistic.

It’s simply not realistic that all these players that have never shown a semblance of this all hit career highs by such a large margin. Players sometimes improve out of nowhere to a much higher tier of player. I can think of someone like William Karlsson or Jared McCann as prime examples. You might get 1 or 2 in the league per year. You don’t tend to get three on the same team in a season.
 

Fallschirmyager

Registered User
Jun 25, 2009
5,492
899
If the team that’s leading the league in scoring, goal differential, has the greatest goal scorer of all time, and is second in the nhl in win percentage is forgettable to you, maybe you should just admit to yourself that you don’t actually like hockey.

Or more likely they're placing higher standards on other teams than they do their own. What has been excitable about the team in their avatar in the last decade or so?
 

HTFN

Registered User
Feb 8, 2009
12,571
11,502
Or it’s merely realistic.

It’s simply not realistic that all these players that have never shown a semblance of this all hit career highs by such a large margin. Players sometimes improve out of nowhere to a much higher tier of player. I can think of someone like William Karlsson or Jared McCann as prime examples. You might get 1 or 2 in the league per year. You don’t tend to get three on the same team in a season.
You’re arguing against the margins rather than the concept and double dipping on the same goofy stuff I take issue with.

McMichael, for example, underperformed compared to expectations from fans and probably coaching last year. When we talk about the player you compare from career highs instead of these expectations, so this pace seems wildly unsustainable. The reality is that people watching him last year knew correcting his shot alone would see huge improvement on top of a regular year of physical growth, which is what we see.

Protas showed big flashes last year of a high IQ top-6 still learning to develop his feet and use his frame. I am well documented last season saying that if he added one major tool to his game he would turn a massive corner, the conversation was literally about how somebody with this size and talent wouldn’t follow conventional development standards.

I’m not going to fault people for not following Capitals prospects but to us this is nowhere near as surprising and harder to wave off as a fluke. I don’t fault you for seeing the trend and showing pause, but I don’t think you can watch the players and identify them as playing above their heads right now.
 

Dipsy Doodle

Rent A Barn
May 28, 2006
77,022
21,755
In a couple of years Sid will be 40 years old and Malkin/Letang will be gone.

Will be full rebuild mode for the Pens by then.
Crosby will be the same age Ovechkin is now. Not many Caps left from Ovechkin's heyday still playing with them yet here they are.

We'll see how things go.
 

Ad

Upcoming events

Ad

Ad