Hockey Outsider
Registered User
- Jan 16, 2005
- 9,453
- 15,678
No worries (and no need to apologize - it's not a bad thing to spend less time online over the holidays).Sorry for the late come back. I understand what you're trying to say but I have absolutely ZERO dog in this fight... My favorite players from this era were Pavel Bure (that I disqualified because he retired too young), Felix Potvin, Nicklas Lidstrom, Dominik Hasek, Daniel Alfredsson, Miikka Kiprusoff...
I'm not cherry picking anything. I am using GPG (Goals per Game) which is THE best stat to determine goal scoring ability/results... What other stats should be used? Raw goals scored? Was Patrick Marleau a better goal scorer than Guy Lafleur and Maurice Richard? Try to get out of Montreal alive saying that.
Then I am taking in consideration eras where these players played in and try to convert it in the statistics. There's really nothing more than this. If you or anybody don't like the results, there's absolutely nothing I can do about it, it's pure statistics
The same exercise could be done for playoffs if you want, I just didn't do it because well, I have other things to do in life lol
As for the rest, it's already all explained in some of my posts on the subject. It's literally IMPOSSIBLE to say everything in every post. Look at post #137, it's all there
All that said, thank you for constructive criticism, which is much more appreciated than some of the replies we get sometimes
I agree that career totals aren't a good way of measuring players. Otherwise it leads to conclusions that are obviously false (ie Ron Francis > Mario Lemieux, Mark Recchi > Alex Ovechkin, Shane Doan > Maurice Richard, Larry Robinson > Bobby Orr, etc).
I think our disagreement relates to how you're using GPG. What I was trying to explain is - it can be misleading to compare GPG (or assists/points per game) for players with different career lengths. Sticking with the example I used before - Gretzky scored more goals than Bossy in any type of head to head comparison. You can compare their best 3, 5, 7, or 10 years (or any other number). You can make those years consecutive or not. You can look at actual goals, or goals per game. You can also look at specific ages (ie from 20 to 25). Whatever parameters you use - Gretzky is ahead.
Bossy is ahead in career GPG because he played a grand total of 22 regular season games after his 30th birthday. Gretzky played 592. Granted, Gretzky declined as a goal scorer as he got older. But it seems wrong to rank Bossy ahead, when Gretzky was better in any type of head-to-head comparison, and Gretzky scored around 200 more goals in his 30's (while Bossy scored close to zero).
Ultimately, my point is - we can measure players using (adjusted) goals per game. But the comparison needs to be on even footing (ie best 5, 7 or 10 years). Otherwise all the players who had long, full careers (Gretzky, Howe, Jagr, etc) are being penalized. (And yes - it's harder to pull the data for that).