One man's garbage is another man's treasure, he wasn't working there, if he works out here the price paid is fine,
Could we have gotten him for less, perhaps. I don't think Vancouver could have gotten a better return for him anyways, but does it matter if we couldn't have gotten an equivalent option for less?
Even if you assume we overpaid for him relative to the market at that moment, we still bought low on a piece with potential to bounce back into a 4/5 role or perhaps even better, which is what you want to see. Dorion's comment about them asking for a 4th and us given them a third because we didn't have a 4th bugs me a bit, you'd think we'd at least get back a 6th or something to balance it out, but in the end it's a minor quibble.
As an aside, I just realized this completes the Dadonov trade, we sent Dadonov to VGK and got back Holden and the third we traded for Hamonic. So a guy not working out that paced at 30 pts for us traded for two D that averaged about 19:30 a night for us, low key good move imo.