Excellent point. We had two up and coming superstars to go with a few other star players.Nothing wrong with a little harmless optimism. Sure, let's play...
Before we can be a contender, let's ask whether today's core is even better than the core from 10 years ago.
The only area the Habs are stronger now than 10 years ago is at C. Plekanec, Desharnais, and Eller are pretty lame compared to Suzuki, Dach, Dvorak, Evans, and 2023 Draft-Pick (not even pencilling in Monahan).
On wing, I'd take Caufield over Pacioretty, but today's overall group is a question-mark until we see what Slafkovsky becomes. We have Anderson versus prime Gallagher from 10 years ago, but after that both rosters had/have a turnstile of replaceable forwards.
No one is close to Subban or Markov on D, but today's potential depth is better and much more imposing. The Habs' D a decade ago was the softest in the league. One more top D could make this group very good.
In nets... um....
before going off the deep end and thinking that other fanbases have invaded your poll why not actually do the work and look at who voted no? you set it to show who voted.No other city has a young upcoming team like us, though a couple might be close. We’re gonna shed our bad contracts and sign some great free agents in the next couple of years.. Dubois perhaps..
Suzuki 22
Harris 22
Caufield 21
Dach 21
Xhecaj 21
Guhle 20
Barron 20
Farrell 20
Heineman 20
Mailloux 19
Slafkovsky 18
Beck 18
Mesar 18
2023 1st round pick (x2 minimum) 17/18
Must be lots of Toronto/Boston/Ottawa fans in the poll who voted NO. The poll question is different then the thread title, that also could be confusing, but if the actual poll question is read it’s pretty clear.
We’re winning at least 1 Stanley cup with these kids.
I'd say we need 7 "core" players, not all of whom have to be superstars but who collectively do the job better than their opponents overall.Excellent point. We had two up and coming superstars to go with a few other star players.
One big difference of course was the coaching which was putrid… otherwise I think we actually might’ve been able to win something.
And… we’re not there yet. Even assuming CC is on par with say… Price, who’s our Subban? Suzuki? Then who matches with Max, Markov, Galchenyuk, Gallagher? We’ve got a long way to go. Some of our prospects will hopefully overachieve but some won’t pan out. We’ve got a ways to go.
And even if we assemble a great team, we’re going to need a goalie. Primeau? Maybe…
Off-topic maybe, but Grant McCagg just came out with his 2023 draft list and he has Fantilli over Bedard. Yep, you read Wright.It’s a good start but we’re not there yet. Add a Bedard? Then we can talk…
Right now I see one potential superstar. That’s not enough.
There is no indication that Edmundson’s game has deteriorated. He doesn’t belong in any conversation that includes AHLzner or Gill.Completely agree re Edmundson. The time that he can be moved is running out and the Alzner/Gill zone is fast approaching.
Covid divisions and all, it was quite literally … a sham run.They made it to the stanley cup final already....
Yes he gots all the tools and toolbox, but pretty sure you watched enough hockey to know it's not the first time a player has got all the tools and toolbox and do not suceed.Guhle made Crosby look foolish a few times, just what he showed in that game alone tells me he’s gonna be an elite defenseman. He’s got all the tools and the toolbox, he’s a complete package. Don’t forget we have Mailloux who has a very high ceiling as well.
Yep, a top D is important. Guhle MIGHT become that top-15 D. If not, and if Barron or Mailloux are not that guy either, then they will have to use some of that $17M in cap space to find the right leader back there.
Actually I voted No because I do not believe we have enough core pieces yet. It's possible to get them with good management, or at least enough to compete for the Cup, which I would consider at least multiple Conference finals or one Stanley Cup Final plus two more Final Eight appearances.Yes he gots all the tools and toolbox, but pretty sure you watched enough hockey to know it's not the first time a player has got all the tools and toolbox and do not suceed.
Dahlin only start to look like it...and he was pretty much supposed to be generational talent level from day 1.
Ghule sure look good. But I would be careful before labeling him Elite. If it took 2-3 years for a Dahlin to reach is level...I simply think it's normal for a Guhle to take 3-5 years to get there...if he get there.
Mailloux is nice. Just like Nate the Gr8 was. So much can happen btw OHL and NHL
How can you put Mailloux/Barron in the discussion for a top 15D in the league or #1D in the league ? Almost every team have 1-2-3 prospect like that. Most of them, fail. Our prospect wont be different.
How many top 15D/Future top 15D in the league made it to UFA in their prime ?
Counting for that to happen is wishfull thinkind. Unless HuGo already have talk with those kind of player that will become UFA in 2-3-4 years (I know it's illegal...but we aint stupid either...those talk do happen).
Our best bet in order : Guhle, UFA, other prospect.
With that said, I don't know how someone can answer the question of the thread with a confident yes...let alone multiple cup.
Well, I don't think we'll finish last this year so that will probably not be too much of a concern for us. From what I understand, it's a deeper draft so hopefully we get a top ten or something like that. We just need to continue accumulating talent.Off-topic maybe, but Grant McCagg just came out with his 2023 draft list and he has Fantilli over Bedard. Yep, you read Wright.
Say what you want about Grant, but he has made calls like these before, and at times been borne out in the actual draft. Jones, Patrick, Wright, Byfield all went lower than consensus early ranking, but in accordance with
Grant's ranking.
Will we all soon need new memes that rhyme with Fantilli?
Always size.Off-topic maybe, but Grant McCagg just came out with his 2023 draft list and he has Fantilli over Bedard. Yep, you read Wright.
Say what you want about Grant, but he has made calls like these before, and at times been borne out in the actual draft. Jones, Patrick, Wright, Byfield all went lower than consensus early ranking, but in accordance with
Grant's ranking.
Will we all soon need new memes that rhyme with Fantilli?
I think there is 60% chance Habs own draft pick is a top 10, and a 15% chance Florida's pick is top 10.Well, I don't think we'll finish last this year so that will probably not be too much of a concern for us. From what I understand, it's a deeper draft so hopefully we get a top ten or something like that. We just need to continue accumulating talent.
Nick and Cole are not what we call generational talent. They are very talented, engaged and motivated, but far away from the Crosby's and McDavid's. This team lacks such a player. Dach is turning it out around, so there is promise. Perhaps, Slaf can develop into the next star. The potential is there, but none will outshine Matthews, Ovy, McDavid or Crosby.
It's harder to win one if you play for a canadian club.Only two of them have a Cup and Ovechkin took 14 years to win one. You don't need a generational player to win a Cup.
It's harder to win one if you play for a canadian club.
Exactly why I left the votes openChanged my vote to yes......Suzuki's ceiling is Bergeron. Cole's ceiling is Stammer. Bergeron + Stammer = Cup core.
AbsolutelyIm not sure this poll will age well. I bet this team gonna win a stanley cup in 2027/2028. At least. Suzuki will win a stanley cup as captain.
Only two of them have a Cup and Ovechkin took 14 years to win one. You don't need a generational player to win a Cup.