Disney Star Wars General Discussion

Rob

Registered User
Feb 27, 2002
9,192
1,590
New Brunswick
Visit site

johnjm22

Pseudo Intellectual
Aug 2, 2005
20,962
17,840
Disney has revealed that its controversial Star Wars streaming show The Acolyte came in "over the production budget" with its costs hitting $230.1 million (£172.7 million) when it was only part of the way through post production.

So it was even more than 230M?

I skimmed the article but didn't see any explanation for the excessive costs.

The show felt like it had been through re-writes and re-shoots. I'm guessing that's the reason.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Osprey and Rob

x Tame Impala

HFBoards Sponsor
Sponsor
Aug 24, 2011
28,738
13,745
If you tell a good story, nothing else matters. If you tell a bad story, people can't help but notice and exaggerate the negative qualities.

There's plenty of terrible dialogue, dumb moments, bad character development, etc...in the original trilogy. None of it matters because the movies were fun and the story was cool.
 

Osprey

Registered User
Feb 18, 2005
27,909
10,773
I skimmed the article but didn't see any explanation for the excessive costs.

The show felt like it had been through re-writes and re-shoots. I'm guessing that's the reason.
I read the whole article and got the impression that the author was more interested in defending the show and its cost than in critically examining why it was so expensive.

Reportedly, re-shoots occurred as recently as last November and December. That's after the UK filings in September (according to the article), so the cost of those re-shoots and the post-production work on them should be on top of the $230M.
 
Last edited:

Shockmaster

Registered User
Sep 11, 2012
16,132
3,486
The only difference between Lucasfilm under Kathleen Kennedy and a steaming pile of horse shit is that the latter doesn't require throwing billions of dollars away.
 
  • Haha
Reactions: Big Poppa Puck

MadDevil

HFBoards Sponsor
Sponsor
Feb 10, 2007
34,774
26,367
Bismarck, ND
The only difference between Lucasfilm under Kathleen Kennedy and a steaming pile of horse shit is that the latter doesn't require throwing billions of dollars away.
It's like a GM being with a team for a decade, going through multiple head coaches, and making the playoffs like twice. At some point the GM needs to go and you need to bring in somebody else.

What I worry about is them replacing the GM with the assistant GM, who then makes the same mistakes the GM made.
 

PeteWorrell

[...]
Aug 31, 2006
5,074
2,201
The only difference between Lucasfilm under Kathleen Kennedy and a steaming pile of horse shit is that the latter doesn't require throwing billions of dollars away.
It's crazy how the Star Wars brand has been devalued. It went from theatrical blockbuster to small screen direct-to-video.

Most people would get lambasted and fired over it but it seems like Kennedy is coated with some chemical compound as nothing ever sticks. She can just do whatever she wants.
 

johnjm22

Pseudo Intellectual
Aug 2, 2005
20,962
17,840


While Disney attempted to have the lawsuit thrown out....a judge has denied the studio’s appeal, and the trial will move ahead in September 2025.

US District Judge Sherilyn Peace Garnett said:“Having considered the parties’ submissions, the relevant law, and the record in this case, the Court DENIES the Motion.”

The lawsuit continues to move forward. Judge threw out Disney's latest appeal.
 

Shockmaster

Registered User
Sep 11, 2012
16,132
3,486




The lawsuit continues to move forward. Judge threw out Disney's latest appeal.
View attachment 918883

hHW81be.gif
 
  • Haha
Reactions: shakes the clown

Osprey

Registered User
Feb 18, 2005
27,909
10,773
I don't like the idea of hiring someone who's been heavily involved in Marvel to do not just one Star Wars film, but three. That said, it won't matter if they never get made and this is just another lie to investors to give them hope that they might eventually get their money back.
 
Last edited:

x Tame Impala

HFBoards Sponsor
Sponsor
Aug 24, 2011
28,738
13,745
Hype level = 0

I'm expecting another "lowest common denominator" entry in the series. Would love to be wrong and enjoy a generation-defying Star Wars trilogy however.
 
  • Like
Reactions: johnjm22

johnjm22

Pseudo Intellectual
Aug 2, 2005
20,962
17,840

Simon Kinberg is also supposed to be working on a Star Trek film for Paramount.

I find this ironic considering JJ Abrams was also doing Star Trek before Lucas Film tapped him to do Star Wars.

What an uninspired choice.
 

johnjm22

Pseudo Intellectual
Aug 2, 2005
20,962
17,840

Looking further back, the financial statements reveal that the production was "within budget" right up to August 2016 – one month after filming wrapped. However, that all changed over the course of the next 16 months when reshoots reportedly took place. The movie had blown its budget by the end of 2017 just a few weeks after the movie had been released. However, it didn't stop there.
 

Ad

Upcoming events

Ad

Ad