Player Discussion The Slaf Thread - Parabolic Growth Edition

Mrb1p

PRICERSTOPDAPUCK
Dec 10, 2011
91,719
58,815
Citizen of the world
What a terrible take.
Okay Mike's Mom.

Malkin has HOF IQ. There's someone in between that and low IQ. low IQ, mid IQ, high IQ, elite IQ, HOF IQ, generational IQ. Slaf definitely has higher than average IQ.
Nah, he has about average IQ for a NHL player, which is below average for a top 6er.

The main reason why he's always a step behind is his IQ, it's not his physical skills. It's fine too, he doesn't need to be a high IQ player to be a great player and I still believe in him. I'm just not sure why we have to bury our head in the sand and act like it's all perfect in La la land.

Man shit f***ing sucks in here these days.
 

Mrb1p

PRICERSTOPDAPUCK
Dec 10, 2011
91,719
58,815
Citizen of the world
Many will castigate you for this perspective, but, really, if you watch Slafkovsky play absent bias and the natural desire to see him perform well to justify his selection, his performance this year has been radically sub-par. There have been precious few standout moments or demonstrations of skill; eleven points in seventeen games with only a single goal is radically disappointing in the extreme, particularly when he's generating no scoring chances and rarely seems to even be able to get off a shot, averaging just over one per game.

Frankly, the conclusion to his previous year is looking more like a fluke statistical anomaly considering how poor his hockey sense and decision making has been from the outset - one of his great deficiencies that led him to taking so many massive hits in the first year.
Meh, Slaf is still a good player with good potential and I doubt it was a fluke. The regression IS scary though and despite all his known short comings? Slaf is still marginally the same player he was at the start of last year. I understand they can't transplant a new brain in him, hes always going to have slightly slower processing speed and he's not going to be balls to the wall all the time. His shot still being this poor though?

The coaching and management staff is utterly disappointing.
 

Miller Time

Registered User
Sep 16, 2004
24,271
17,124
Okay Mike's Mom.

On the one hand, you claim Slaf has "low hockey IQ"

On the other hand, you're disappointed because in D3 he's pacing for 60pts when you expected more...

Kucherov D3 - 18pts
Rantanen D3 -38pts
MacKinnon D3 - 52pts
Barkov D3 - 59pts

Etc
Etc

Having unrealistic expectations is one thing...
Being disappointed when those unrealistic expectations aren't met is pretty foolish...

Having wholly incoherent takes that are devoid of any logic or rational coherence is... The root of your terrible takes.

Even Mike's mom can figure that out.

Carry on with the nonsense posts 😂

The coaching and management staff is utterly disappointing.

Only to posters without a clue about sport or team performance lol
 

Mrb1p

PRICERSTOPDAPUCK
Dec 10, 2011
91,719
58,815
Citizen of the world
On the one hand, you claim Slaf has "low hockey IQ"

On the other hand, you're disappointed because in D3 he's pacing for 60pts when you expected more...

Kucherov D3 - 18pts
Rantanen D3 -38pts
MacKinnon D3 - 52pts
Barkov D3 - 59pts

Etc
Etc

Having unrealistic expectations is one thing...
Being disappointed when those unrealistic expectations aren't met is pretty foolish...

Having wholly incoherent takes that are devoid of any logic or rational coherence is... The root of your terrible takes.

Even Mike's mom can figure that out.

Carry on with the nonsense posts 😂



Only to posters without a clue about sport or team performance lol
Man if you only read one second instead of being all up in Mike Mathesons panties you may understand the coherence in my argument.

But it's a lot easier to take out the pitchfork, aint it?
 

Miller Time

Registered User
Sep 16, 2004
24,271
17,124
Man if you only read one second instead of being all up in Mike Mathesons panties you may understand the coherence in my argument.

But it's a lot easier to take out the pitchfork, aint it?

Speaking of "reading", What's with your obsession about Matheson? Wholly irrelevant to anything discussed here.

There is no coherence to your "argument". It's an empty rant, pitchfork indeed lol.

you think Slaf has "low hockey IQ", yet you expected production from him outpacing some of the highest IQ forwards in the game at the same age.... Incoherent.

You claim "luck" for Slaf's (& Caufield) production this far, yet your disappointed in him for not producing more... Incoherent.

Your frustrated with coaching and management for not getting more out of players you see as "lucky" to produce what they are producing... Incoherent.

The lack of basic reasoning in your rants and hot takes is actually impressive in its absurdity.

Can't even agree to disagree with this kind of nonsense "argument"... There's no actual argument, just irrational complaining.

As you pointed out in the guhle thread, getting called out for garbage takes is the price of admission on a message board. Don't like it, try offering an argument that is at least remotely coherent.
 

dackelljuneaubulis02

Registered User
Oct 13, 2012
11,851
7,456
Meh, Slaf is still a good player with good potential and I doubt it was a fluke. The regression IS scary though and despite all his known short comings? Slaf is still marginally the same player he was at the start of last year. I understand they can't transplant a new brain in him, hes always going to have slightly slower processing speed and he's not going to be balls to the wall all the time. His shot still being this poor though?

The coaching and management staff is utterly disappointing.
Slaf makes way too many quick nifty passes to trot this ‘low processing speed’ thing all the time. But you’re hella smart so if you have a real argument as to why that’s not related to processing speed/IQ, I’m genuinely all ears.

He’s still a kid in a giant’s body who’s producing not that bad despite not playing well. That’s usually a good sign lol.

There does seem to be something going on with the team as a whole. Whether it’s conditioning or the non stop injuries making them a little shook, who knows.
 

KevSkillz4

Registered User
Apr 11, 2016
8,109
13,653
I think he just need to keep his game simple with great forecheck.

The perfect exemple it's against Buffalo, he played his real identity. Great forecheck.

Slaf have great offensive ability, we all see that, he just need to know using his shot at good times. This guy have everything to succeed and become a high productive player.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Pomee and Andrei79

Ad

Upcoming events

Ad

Ad