Blue Jays Discussion: Dickey Wins Gold Glove.

  • PLEASE check any bookmark on all devices. IF you see a link pointing to mandatory.com DELETE it Please use this URL https://forums.hfboards.com/
Status
Not open for further replies.

Nasty Nazem

Come at me Crow!
Apr 5, 2010
28,848
0
Canada
As a rule of thumb, if MLBTR doesn't have the rumor or speculation up on their site a few minutes after you see the rumor, its not legit.
 

The Nemesis

Semper Tyrannus
Apr 11, 2005
89,250
33,861
Langley, BC
People don't want "garbage" reclamation project pitchers or anything like that, but there are Halladay suggestions being thrown out?

Take off the nostalgia filters. Doc isn't what he once was. Not even close. Everything is trending in the wrong direction. For more years than you can just say are the fault of his shoulder injury. The injury just pushed things along a little quicker.

Its sad to see happen and have to admit, but I think we're looking at Tim Lincecum territory here: probable prolonged periods of terribly depressing sucking combined with the occasional gem start that gives false hope.

I like the cut of your jib.

What's a jib?

Also is the poop deck really what I think it is?

:sarcasm:
 

Bjindaho

Registered User
Jun 12, 2006
7,172
1,868
People don't want "garbage" reclamation project pitchers or anything like that, but there are Halladay suggestions being thrown out?

Take off the nostalgia filters. Doc isn't what he once was. Not even close. Everything is trending in the wrong direction. For more years than you can just say are the fault of his shoulder injury. The injury just pushed things along a little quicker.

Its sad to see happen and have to admit, but I think we're looking at Tim Lincecum territory here: probable prolonged periods of terribly depressing sucking combined with the occasional gem start that gives false hope.



What's a jib?

Also is the poop deck really what I think it is?

:sarcasm:

He was exceptional 3 years ago, very good 2 until his injury and not so good when he came back. No one is expecting a #1, but he could be another Beurhle.
 

The Nemesis

Semper Tyrannus
Apr 11, 2005
89,250
33,861
Langley, BC
There are some stats that should make us nervous about Bronson too...his velocity has not decreased but his Contact% and Contact on balls in the zone% are trended slowly up (92.6% of the pitches in the zone he threw that were swung at and not fouled off were put in play). Also, his Swinging Strike rate is gradually dropping. His ERA was significantly better than his FIP especially and if his peripherals don't improve, he could drop off completely in the AL East.

Some of the FIP noise comes from pitching in the Cincy bandbox where his HR rate combined with low K totals will poison the numbers. Also he has historically always outperformed his FIP/xFIP with the Reds.

Also his SwSt% isn't gradually dropping. It took a big hit about 4 years ago, but has varied up and down. 6.5, 6.8, 5.8, 6.7, 6.0. If that's trending down, it's only doing so slightly.

He's also generating more grounders and fewer fly balls, probably going hand in hand with the fewer swinging strikes and Ks. Also his SIERA is going in the right direction.

Obviously there's huge risk with any pitcher at his age, and there's not a whole lot of "suddenly he gets hot and is lights out" potential, but for at least a year he probably is what he is right now: a serviceable back-end innings-eater.
 

theaub

34-38-61-10-13-15
Nov 21, 2008
18,886
1,977
Toronto
I wouldn't be against Halladay tbh, I just don't see where he fits in as a #5 starter when we have enough of those already.

This team needs to acquire an impact #1/2 starter. It is borderline delusional to think that Halladay can provide that.
 

Bjindaho

Registered User
Jun 12, 2006
7,172
1,868
Some of the FIP noise comes from pitching in the Cincy bandbox where his HR rate combined with low K totals will poison the numbers. Also he has historically always outperformed his FIP/xFIP with the Reds.

Also his SwSt% isn't gradually dropping. It took a big hit about 4 years ago, but has varied up and down. 6.5, 6.8, 5.8, 6.7, 6.0. If that's trending down, it's only doing so slightly.

He's also generating more grounders and fewer fly balls, probably going hand in hand with the fewer swinging strikes and Ks. Also his SIERA is going in the right direction.

Obviously there's huge risk with any pitcher at his age, and there's not a whole lot of "suddenly he gets hot and is lights out" potential, but for at least a year he probably is what he is right now: a serviceable back-end innings-eater.

It is a slow decline, but he went from 10 to 9 to 8 to high 6's to 6 even last year. The problem is that right now hitters are taking a lot of presumably hittable strikes from him.

His GB/FB seems to bounce all over the place, but it did strike me as odd that he had that high of a K/9 given how easy his pitches are to put in play.

And saying that Cinci hurts his numbers doesn't help when TO is bad for that too.

I'm not saying that he's terrible, but there are two sides to every argument and no starters on the market without significant question marks.
 

Bjindaho

Registered User
Jun 12, 2006
7,172
1,868
I wouldn't be against Halladay tbh, I just don't see where he fits in as a #5 starter when we have enough of those already.

This team needs to acquire an impact #1/2 starter. It is borderline delusional to think that Halladay can provide that.

He's not close to that. He's a 3/4/5. He could be better than a Happ/Redmond/Rogers, but not top of the rotation at all.

If we want 1/2, we need to trade. There is no one on the market that fits the bill and doesn't have huge question marks (TBH, I think Santana might be a 3 on another team).
 

Bob Barker

Registered User
Jun 2, 2008
1,833
420
He's not close to that. He's a 3/4/5. He could be better than a Happ/Redmond/Rogers, but not top of the rotation at all.

If we want 1/2, we need to trade. There is no one on the market that fits the bill and doesn't have huge question marks (TBH, I think Santana might be a 3 on another team).

Unless his price goes way, WAY down, Santana is going to be the most asinine signing of the offseason.
 

Mr Knies Guy

Registered User
Jul 5, 2008
10,986
1,420
Heard on Fan that Jays have meeting with Stringfellow tomorrow to talk about his client Santana
 

Diamond Joe Quimby

A$AP Joffrey
Aug 14, 2010
13,547
2,996
Washington, DC
oh not Johan my bad :)

Ervin

100 million for 5 yrs does seem alot

It absolutely does. Realistically, the most he should get is something similar to the Lackey deal (5 years, $82m) from a couple winters ago as the best starter in a week free agent class. And that's assuming he's the top guy available, which I don't believe he is.
 

topched

Registered User
Nov 19, 2008
7,851
115
Toronto, Ontario
Bartolo Fatass Colon over Doc Halladay, please.

A year ago I thought the Jays were so organized, this offseason though everything just looks like a mess.

Numbers don't lie. Colon was lights out last year.... Competely defying logic

I think we should just sign every sp who is receiving "treatment" in the carribean
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Ad

Upcoming events

Ad

Ad