Nasty Nazem
Come at me Crow!
As a rule of thumb, if MLBTR doesn't have the rumor or speculation up on their site a few minutes after you see the rumor, its not legit.
I like the cut of your jib.
People don't want "garbage" reclamation project pitchers or anything like that, but there are Halladay suggestions being thrown out?
Take off the nostalgia filters. Doc isn't what he once was. Not even close. Everything is trending in the wrong direction. For more years than you can just say are the fault of his shoulder injury. The injury just pushed things along a little quicker.
Its sad to see happen and have to admit, but I think we're looking at Tim Lincecum territory here: probable prolonged periods of terribly depressing sucking combined with the occasional gem start that gives false hope.
What's a jib?
Also is the poop deck really what I think it is?
There are some stats that should make us nervous about Bronson too...his velocity has not decreased but his Contact% and Contact on balls in the zone% are trended slowly up (92.6% of the pitches in the zone he threw that were swung at and not fouled off were put in play). Also, his Swinging Strike rate is gradually dropping. His ERA was significantly better than his FIP especially and if his peripherals don't improve, he could drop off completely in the AL East.
What's a jib?
Also is the poop deck really what I think it is?
Some of the FIP noise comes from pitching in the Cincy bandbox where his HR rate combined with low K totals will poison the numbers. Also he has historically always outperformed his FIP/xFIP with the Reds.
Also his SwSt% isn't gradually dropping. It took a big hit about 4 years ago, but has varied up and down. 6.5, 6.8, 5.8, 6.7, 6.0. If that's trending down, it's only doing so slightly.
He's also generating more grounders and fewer fly balls, probably going hand in hand with the fewer swinging strikes and Ks. Also his SIERA is going in the right direction.
Obviously there's huge risk with any pitcher at his age, and there's not a whole lot of "suddenly he gets hot and is lights out" potential, but for at least a year he probably is what he is right now: a serviceable back-end innings-eater.
I wouldn't be against Halladay tbh, I just don't see where he fits in as a #5 starter when we have enough of those already.
This team needs to acquire an impact #1/2 starter. It is borderline delusional to think that Halladay can provide that.
He's not close to that. He's a 3/4/5. He could be better than a Happ/Redmond/Rogers, but not top of the rotation at all.
If we want 1/2, we need to trade. There is no one on the market that fits the bill and doesn't have huge question marks (TBH, I think Santana might be a 3 on another team).
Heard on Fan that Jays have meeting with Stringfellow tomorrow to talk about his client Santana
Santana is 35 in March
Risky
Santana is 35 in March
Risky
Also Jose Bautista's agent, oddly enough.
Or 31 in December. Whatever, pretty much the same.
my bad- Ervin is the one I meant.oh not Johan my bad
Ervin
oh not Johan my bad
Ervin
100 million for 5 yrs does seem alot
Bartolo Fatass Colon over Doc Halladay, please.
A year ago I thought the Jays were so organized, this offseason though everything just looks like a mess.
Santana is 35 in March
Risky
Bartolo Fatass Colon over Doc Halladay, please.
A year ago I thought the Jays were so organized, this offseason though everything just looks like a mess.