Devils team discussion (news, notes and speculation) - season begins!

AfroThunder396

[citation needed]
Jan 8, 2006
39,551
24,877
Miami, FL
If we beat Detroit tonight then we're 6-3-1 in the first ten which is honestly better than I thought it would be. This is just the first 1/8th of the season with a new system, new players, and two top-4 defensemen injured.

I don't care if the wins are against bad teams, wins are wins and points are points, and we need both of them. Keep the record above water while they figure this out.

My level of concern is only like a 3 or 4 right now, and a lot of it has to do with the goaltending which is certainly better than Vanecek/Schmid/Blackwood but I'm not convinced they are to be relied upon. They look both look old and inconsistent.
 
Last edited:

ZachaFlockaFlame

Registered User
Aug 24, 2020
15,450
20,224
would love this guy simply so we didn’t have to play him. i swear he scores every time we play a team that has him.

He's a Devil killer for sure but I've stated why I think he'd be great with Jack, he's an effortless skater + his shot is so f***ing lethal he doesn't need to pepper the goalie which is exactly what Jack needs. He needs an efficient scorer from his wing, not someone who needs 5-6 shots a game to score.
 

Devils731

Registered User
Jun 23, 2008
12,866
18,165
NJ have been torched on the high cycle. Their low zone protecting the house just isn’t working. They are allowing 3 guys high time and space to get dangerous chances off.

I think the rest of their game looks promising, they generate a ton of scoring chances when they arent pinned in their own end.
Agreed with this, I made a similar comment during the game.

Earlier in the year the Devils were getting out and actually hassling the puck at the defensive blue line. Last 2 home games they’ve been much more passive where they’re gliding out somewhere vaguely in the area of the point man. I even complimented the hassling of the point men early in the year and how that was a needed change, so it’s disappointing it’s reverted lately.

I don’t know which is the true way the Devils want to play. The more challenging early year or the more passive last 2 games. I’m assuming it’s the former with Keefe talking about guys needing to work more. If so, it probably means the wingers are dropping a little too low to try and lend additional slot support so it may still fall into the “breaking old habits” category.
 

ZachaFlockaFlame

Registered User
Aug 24, 2020
15,450
20,224
Agreed with this, I made a similar comment during the game.

Earlier in the year the Devils were getting out and actually hassling the puck at the defensive blue line. Last 2 home games they’ve been much more passive where they’re gliding out somewhere vaguely in the area of the point man. I even complimented the hassling of the point men early in the year and how that was a needed change, so it’s disappointing it’s reverted lately.

I don’t know which is the true way the Devils want to play. The more challenging early year or the more passive last 2 games. I’m assuming it’s the former with Keefe talking about guys needing to work more. If so, it probably means the wingers are dropping a little too low to try and lend additional slot support so it may still fall into the “breaking old habits” category.

Some of this will get fixed with Luke mainly because his ability to make an outlet is arguably the best on the team, I actually think he'll thrive under Keefe. Some of their defensive zone woes are some of the guys, mainly the dmen, carrying the puck like a grenade and hope playing it to the forwards
 

Blackjack

Registered User
Feb 13, 2003
18,382
15,408
keyjhboardd +bro]ke
Visit site
Rangers forwards (early 30s) improve every year, every year is a career year, the back half of the contract that was supposed to be an albatross is now a fantastic bargain

Devils forwards (early 20s) wait this guy can’t play with that guy, he had an injury 18 months ago you can’t expect him to just bounce back this quickly, Keefe said something nice about me so time to disappear completely for three games
 

SteveCangialosi123

Registered User
Feb 17, 2012
29,253
52,256
NJ
Rangers forwards (early 30s) improve every year, every year is a career year, the back half of the contract that was supposed to be an albatross is now a fantastic bargain

Devils forwards (early 20s) wait this guy can’t play with that guy, he had an injury 18 months ago you can’t expect him to just bounce back this quickly, Keefe said something nice about me so time to disappear completely for three games
Zibanejad has been complete ass at 5 on 5. Kreider had that one crazy season, mostly fueled by insane PP finishing. Seems like most of the fan base can’t stand him half the time.
 

glenwo2

JESPER BRATWURST
Oct 18, 2008
52,446
24,906
New Jersey(No Fanz!)
If we beat Detroit tonight then we're 6-3-1 in the first ten which is honestly better than I thought it would be. This is just the first 1/8th of the season with a new system, new players, and two top-4 defensemen injured.

I don't care if the wins are against bad teams, wins are wins and points are points, and we need both of them. Keep the record above water while they figure this out.

My level of concern is only like a 3 or 4 right now, and a lot of it has to do with the goaltending which is certainly better than Vanecek/Schmid/Blackwood but I'm not convinced they are to be relied upon. They look both look old and inconsistent.
Detroit's tomorrow...there is no game tonight.
 

RSeen

Registered User
Oct 26, 2011
6,785
2,149
Toronto
I think the bigger problem is the Dillon-Dougie pairing as a whole. I don't expect them to be together for much longer because they've had more bad showings than good.
What change are they going to make? I think Luke and Pesce are going to be a pair, don't think they will go Luke and Dougie. Siegs and Kovacevic have been our best pair so far so not sure they will get broken up.
 

Better Call Sal

Salnalysis
Nov 24, 2011
25,926
40,653
New Jersey
What change are they going to make? I think Luke and Pesce are going to be a pair, don't think they will go Luke and Dougie. Siegs and Kovacevic have been our best pair so far so not sure they will get broken up.

Balance is important. I would likely put Siegs with Dougie since we've seen them be successful in the past and Dillon with Kovacevic.

I'd love to keep Siegs and Kovacevic together, but Dillon and Dougie as a pairing have had a few disaster games and I think I read Keefe already separated them in the 3rd last night so I think he recognizes it as well.
 

JrFischer54

Registered User
Apr 4, 2017
10,812
4,441
If we beat Detroit tonight then we're 6-3-1 in the first ten which is honestly better than I thought it would be. This is just the first 1/8th of the season with a new system, new players, and two top-4 defensemen injured.

I don't care if the wins are against bad teams, wins are wins and points are points, and we need both of them. Keep the record above water while they figure this out.

My level of concern is only like a 3 or 4 right now, and a lot of it has to do with the goaltending which is certainly better than Vanecek/Schmid/Blackwood but I'm not convinced they are to be relied upon. They look both look old and inconsistent.

the goaltending? part of the reason the team has 6 wins is because the goaltending. thats the least of the worry. just provide average/good goaltending
 
  • Like
Reactions: Devs3cups

Deviled

Registered User
Oct 10, 2024
112
147
Too bad we don’t play tonight :sarcasm:
IMG_5145.gif


IMG_5150.png
 

Ad

Upcoming events

Ad

Ad