All very legit questions and I have no idea what’s going to happen. There are some moves I’d like to see but not sure how realistic they are and if it’s the best moves or not.
Id like a very good defensively sound 3rd line that’s hard to play against and can chip in offence. No sure how to do that or what to do with the guys currently in the roster but that’s what I’d like to see for an end result.
Add a RHD that is in the mold of Seigenthaler. Only UFA I see that are somewhat like that is Lybushkin , Manson , Gudbranson .
Goalie - no god damn clue. I personally like Gibson but a lot of people say he is cooked and his contract is hefty and for another 5 years…
Other guys have question marks too - Husso - flash in the pan? Keumper - will Avs resign him ? Injury concerns ?
Do we need to add to the top 6 ? Or is Shara Hughes Mercer and Bratt Nico Holtz good enough ? That would leave a crappy 3rd line in my opinion. I do not like Zacha Tatar Johnson but .. what the hell do you do with all three and who do we replace them with? I’d like to move all three and try to revamp the entire third line with very good defensive and hard to play against guys . Ideal line - Nuke Trochek ( he will get paid ! 6mil and that’s way too much for a 3c) Marchment or Neiderrieder or Motte or ?
Then where does Boqvist go? I’m not sure if he is a good 3c and if he’s nkt at 3c , where do you play him?
4th line - I really like Bastian and Wood . Wood though only on the 4th line , I don’t thnk he is a very good 3rd line option if it’s for long stretches of games. McLeod I am also undecided on. I like his face off ability and effort but other than that ???
I think our D is very decent but could use one or two more guys like Seigs. Hopefully one spot can fill Subbans departure with one of the UFA i mentioned above.
Havig said all that , what do we do with guys like Zetterlund , Thompson , Greer , Foote , etc if they show they are ready for the NHL? I guess they can rotate in to fill in for injuries or if someone is not playing well . But only if you promote a guy on a lower line and move one of the kids on the 4th line or ?
We seem to be on a similar thought wave.
I questioned the "top 6" because that appears to be what the Devils are currently simmering, but have too many to fill those wing slots when only 4 are needed and Bratt, Sharangovich, Mercer, and Holtz seem to be the current targets. There are a couple guys out there as I mentioned who will be UFAs that would make the top 6 dynamic. Sharangovich and Mercer would be the odd 2 out.
Then the question is can Mercer who is only 20 yrs-old be groomed into a very good 3C with Shara and another like Zetterlund be a different kind of 3rd line? One with a high offensive potential that the other team has to deal with defensively. I think they could. Holtz is top 6 or a top trade item. He seems to be growing into that role. He is not a bottom 6 player.
If the answer is to go with the 6 you mention that NJ looks to be moving towards, then some of those guys you list at the end like Z, Foote, Thompson, and Greer are really just top 6 guys who weren't good enough at this stage to push their way into that elite number and are of a similar age group. You can't just cupboard them in the AHL until you might need them. Greer would be the guy you do that with, but he would have to get a nice paycheck to hang around knowing he is the 14th forward. You can package the rest with other moves to get some of the other pieces you wish for.
1 of Nuke, Trochet, Niederreiter, Marchmant, etc. would go very well to create that Shara/Mercer/Other 3rd line I was talking about.
The roadblocks to these kind of forwards are Tatar and Johnsson with contracts that are hard to find takers for without paying some of the contracts to the takers.
If you had those 3 lines, Mcleod, Bastian, Kukkonen, Boqvist, Zetterlund, Thompson, Foote, Greer, Vesey, Tatar, and Johnsson are all extra players used to compose a 4th line and 2 extra forwards or combine in multiple ways to trade, and some with their ELCs still intact can still go back to the AHL and go up and down without waiver issues. They can also bloom in that extra AHL time and end up better than some of the Devils young blood that didn't get any better as expected. The AHL guy(s) then push into the lineup and replace the stalled one(s). Those 2 or 3 new acquired guys give the Devils the kind of depth that successful franchises seem to keep rolling into their lineups.
As to the D, Hughes is percolating for what is likely just 1 more college season. He would join the Devils at the end of his sophomore college season. The best move would be to sign him to his ELC starting in 2023-24 and let him play the remainder of his sophomore season in the AHL. He will still be very young (won't turn 20 until September). Saves a season of his ELC and let's the first big contract wait an extra season while the Devils are getting the rest of their eggs arranged. This, unless of course, the Devils are in the playoffs and Luke appears to be so much better than what they have on 1 of their 3 pairings that got them there. Then again, are they headed for a Cup challenge? Doubtful. Let their season play out and let Luke gets his feet wet in Utica. it may be the only AHL time he will see.
This would only mean acquiring 1 D-man for next season to replace PK and hope one of Walsh/OK can be of use next season. If worse came to worse and PK would be willing to settle for a shorter cheaper ticket, he could be useful for 1 more season. There are other D out there. A couple teams have stockpiled D on their farm and maybe 1 of them could be pried loose for something they need. Arizona and Ottawa have a situation where they seem to dump good players the second they will require a new contract of any substance. LA has a few as well.