Devils team discussion (news, notes and speculation) - part VI

Status
Not open for further replies.

Guttersniped

I like goalies who stop the puck
Sponsor
Dec 20, 2018
22,675
50,599
Speaking of next year’s goalies, what are the chances Blackwood is back?

He’s actually got a reasonable QO and probably has created some trade value this year.

I don’t hate the idea of going into camp with him, Schmid and Vanecek battling for the two spots. If Schmid wins a spot, trade one of the other two.

Almost no chance to completely no chance. This second trip to IR after getting injured in practice makes it impossible in my mind.

Blackwood has started in 16 games and played in 17 after 60 GP by the team.

I don’t see 3.36m reasonable for a guy who can’t stay healthy long enough to even be a functional backup.

If we didn’t have Akira step in and play this well in 8 starts/ 11 GP this would be a way bigger problem now.

He should only make that if he can contribute a lot more. I’m done. Maybe he puts it all together on another team. If he does, good for him.
 

The Wumpus

bottomless pit supervisor
May 9, 2011
8,051
10,328
Morristown, NJ
The answer to tomorrow's trivia will be Phil Housley
1677776309287.png
 

Guttersniped

I like goalies who stop the puck
Sponsor
Dec 20, 2018
22,675
50,599
So with Larkin signing yesterday and Pasta today, are we next with Bratt/Meier?

:hockey:

Those guys are UFAs and ours are RFA, so it’s a different situation.

Neither team wanted to trade the player but I don’t think either wanted to get to the off-season with them unsigned.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Devs3cups

Nubmer6

Sleep is a poor substitute for caffeine
Sponsor
Jul 14, 2013
14,318
19,437
The Village
I saw that yesterday, though I can't fathom what sending him down on a paper transaction would actually accomplish since we're not accumulating any cap space with Bernier on LTIR.
I dunno. We're not at the roster limit, are we? Do we just not want to pay the guy?
 

Oneiro

Registered User
Mar 28, 2013
9,892
12,002
I 100% agree and I’m pretty sure Fitz agrees too. But what’s been posted above is different then saying “I absolutely won’t sign anyone above 8”. Fitz will pitch the idea, because he believes in it, but it won’t stop him from signing Bratt or Meier over 8 mil per. When it’s all said and done, I think we’re getting both of them between 8.5-9 mil long-term.

When it was discussed here, it was discussed as a “line in the sand/I won’t budge” type of thing. It really isn’t.
In this case, I don't think it should even be a thing at all. The context of a deal differs from year to year and the cap is a dynamic system reacting to forces beyond even ownership's control.

Success sells itself, treating people well sells itself. But leaning on a good faith deal as a benchmark is not the same as pointing to Brodeur, Bergeron or Lidstrom taking a discount, and it's dumb that it's even a discussion. I'd argue it's worse for the group to show such faith in potential from some players and then refuse to reward actual results from others.
 

Devs3cups

Wind of Change
Sponsor
May 8, 2010
21,720
38,288
In this case, I don't think it should even be a thing at all. The context of a deal differs from year to year and the cap is a dynamic system reacting to forces beyond even ownership's control.

Success sells itself, treating people well sells itself. But leaning on a good faith deal as a benchmark is not the same as pointing to Brodeur, Bergeron or Lidstrom taking a discount, and it's dumb that it's even a discussion. I'd argue it's worse for the group to show such faith in potential from some players and then refuse to reward actual results from others.
I mean, I agree lol, reading the tweets, the first thing that popped in my mind was, “doesn’t every GM in some ways push a team friendly deal/discount?” It’s a pretty common thing and of course that’s what GM’s want, it just doesn’t always happens. As you said, sometimes it does, but more often than not it doesn’t and GM’s adapt and offer/settle on a higher/normal deal.

So yeah, this whole “Fitz no contract over 8 mil” is most likely a whole bunch of nothing.
 
  • Like
Reactions: My3Sons and Oneiro

Mgd31

Registered User
Aug 7, 2007
15,413
10,229
Levittown, NY
Wasn't there supposed to an update on Timo last night after the game saying whether he would be cleared for contact?
 

Devs3cups

Wind of Change
Sponsor
May 8, 2010
21,720
38,288
Wasn't there supposed to an update on Timo last night after the game saying whether he would be cleared for contact?
Ruff said either yesterday or today

Probably find out tomorrow
He said they’d know if he was cleared for contact yesterday or today. Wouldn’t be surprised if we found out his status after practice today.
 

Blackjack

Registered User
Feb 13, 2003
18,382
15,417
keyjhboardd +bro]ke
Visit site
I’ll also post this here, it gives additional context to the rumours that they don’t want to pay anyone more than Jack. Feel like that has been overlooked by her initial tweet, that made it sound like it was a hard stance, when it in fact really isn’t. It’s a preference that will get pitched, but it’s not a “line in the sand” type of thing.

This is so funny. If I was Bratt (or his agent) I’d say “Fitz, I played here cheap when we stunk so pay me big now and just pretend the two scenarios are reversed.”
 

Devs3cups

Wind of Change
Sponsor
May 8, 2010
21,720
38,288
This is so funny. If I was Bratt (or his agent) I’d say “Fitz, I played here cheap when we stunk so pay me big now and just pretend the two scenarios are reversed.”
I mean, I agree, it’s a whole bunch of nothing. It’s basically: “GM pitches a discount/team-friendly deal to player for the future, but if the player doesn’t want to, GM will sign him to a contract both sides agree on”.

A whole bunch of nothing that just stirred the pot and got us nervous for about 2 weeks.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Blackjack
Status
Not open for further replies.

Ad

Upcoming events

Ad

Ad