AfroThunder396
[citation needed]
I've got it - for every challenge, we will go to 3-on-3 challenge time with two live pucks on the ice - one red, one blue. There are no stoppages in challenge time: no freezes, no faceoffs, no penalties. If the blue puck goes in the net first through any circumstances, the home team wins the challenge. If the red puck goes in first, the away team wins the challenge. At the conclusion of the challenge, the scoring team gets to keep their goal, so the away team might decide to score with a blue puck to lose the challenge but still keep their challenge goal.This is good. This is how the coach will challenge a stoppage he disagrees with. The coach instantly restarts play with the new puck and the stoppage challenge is reviewed at the next stoppage.
It shouldn’t be limited to one though. How is that fair? What if there is more than one wrongful stoppage in the game?
If multiple consecutive stoppages are challenged, when there is finally an unchallenged stoppage the refs will review each challenge to determine if the play should really have stopped at that point. They will reset the clock and game state to the earliest correctly called stoppage. The coach that challenged that particular stoppage will be penalized, along with either coach that challenged subsequent stoppages, as they should have known that play should have stopped already.
Every time a goal is scored and not challenged, you bank that challenge for later in the game.