Do you all use this picture on purpose to scare people?
That is nightmare fuel, my guy.
Ya that’s the thing I wonder as well. Don’t see both in Utica next season given Poulter certainly will be one of the two there. Unless of course they do three goalies for the big club which I don’t think is good when one of them is gonna be a young guy you want to get regular reps and game action. I could see it being someone they acquire with Schmid then Daws in Utica.I feel like one of those guys has to be the backup next year. Poulter should have one of the goalie spots in Utica, he’s had a nice year.
Vanecek and Markstrom aren’t remotely comparable. Vitek has been bad every year of his career except a portion of the regular season last year.Like Vitek. Stuck for a while until it stunk.
Vitek was a .909 guy before this year. Markstrom has a career .910. He was also .892 last year. Vitek is .890 this year.Vanecek and Markstrom aren’t remotely comparable. Vitek has been bad every year of his career except a portion of the regular season last year.
Markstrom is a bona fide top 5-7 goalie in the league.
Yes! Great flick.I have never seen A Bronx Tale...is it worth blowing the afternoon on?
pain
Definitely not. His game as cratered and kind of don't want him around the locker roomkuznetsov on waivers. 7.8mm till next year. Would you claim him? He’s a center but that’s a big contract for a player who’s declined the last few years. I’m not sure what his off the ice status is
Yes! Great flick.
It’s been covered endlessly that sv% in isolation means absolutely nothing because it’s very dependent on team effects.Vitek was a .909 guy before this year. Markstrom has a career .910. He was also .892 last year. Vitek is .890 this year.
You literally saw a season ended by goaltending again. Let's see what you think real assets are, barely top 6 players that can't drive play on their own that are severely over hyped?Trading real assets for a goalie over the age of 34 is such a bad idea. Can't stress it enough tbh
People here genuinely have no clue what the hell they are talking about. Half this board thinks its all on the defense even though the metrics like the one's you provide and are talking about show it's the goaltending sinking the team more than anything.It’s been covered endlessly that sv% in isolation means absolutely nothing because it’s very dependent on team effects.
GSAx is much more reliable from an evaluation perspective, and Vitek was never above expected in his entire career.
Adjusting How We Evaluate and Analyze Goaltenders
if markstrom fails then it will fall on coaching and our system, there's no way we'd end up blaming goaltending at that pointThe goaltending conversation really is like insanity. Rewind a month when they started playing Daws and there were a couple of us who said…they’re gonna run him into the ground and he’ll look like a scrub within a few weeks behind this sorry ass system/defense, and people here are still gonna pretend that the next guy in net is gonna be the difference. And voila, here we are, exactly as predicted. When Markstrom fails it will be because he’s washed up, if we just get (insert whoever) he’ll provide at least average goaltender and problem solved…the madness of thinking that just getting that next guy in net is the answer will never end.
He was well above expected just last season. Prior to this season his career GSAx was positive.It’s been covered endlessly that sv% in isolation means absolutely nothing because it’s very dependent on team effects.
GSAx is much more reliable from an evaluation perspective, and Vitek was never above expected in his entire career.
Adjusting How We Evaluate and Analyze Goaltenders
You underestimate the power of some heels around here. They dig deep.if markstrom fails then it will fall on coaching and our system, there's no way we'd end up blaming goaltending at that point