There's a good chance Saros never sees UFA, so if you want him you'll probably have to trade for him and extend him.If they had Markstrom for 3 playoff runs (this season included), I would have been in. But with burning this season, I don't think it's worth the premium assets now just to have an older Markstrom for two years.
Saros and Ullmark are both possibilities in the offseason, but again they're UFAs after next year so (a) you have to give either one a big ticket contract and (b) you can just wait out next season and get them for free as UFAs instead of giving up high 1sts and/or top prospects.
At this point, my plan might be to get a cheaper stop gap on a short term/expiring deal for next season (Kahkonen, Broissoit, Allen, Driedger, DeSmith) and then try to grab Ullmark or Saros in UFA for free.
Nah, no interest in Graves.Siegenthaler for Graves with $750K retained, so salaries basically become a wash. Change of scenery for both. Reunite Graves-Marino & Pitt can run Siegenthaler with one of Letang/Karlsson since Graves has not worked next to either. I’d do it all day.
Knight would be a lottery ticket at best, he's not even at .900 in the AHL this season and he struggled in his last season in the NHL.There's a good chance Saros never sees UFA, so if you want him you'll probably have to trade for him and extend him.
I'm fine with going the cheap route, but outside of Broissoit and maybe Driedger, I'm not interested in any of those goalies. I'd be really interested in what Florida does because they'll probably choose between Spencer Knight and bringing back Stolarz and I'd be very interested in either.
But we do now, why do you think we acquired Mcdermid? I'm not a fan of 1 dimensional goons, and I'm in agreement they're mostly useless, the Geersten experiment was terrible. That's said, I think it's important to have that element of toughness. We're getting pushed around right now, Bastian is out, we got a lot of young players and can't afford more injuries. The team as a whole will hopefully get tougher as they get stronger.There’s a reason we didn’t have anyone and most teams don’t have a goon. They’re completely useless.
A 35 year old Markstom for two years should
A.) Not cost too much with no retention
B.) Gives you a stable option as a starter
C.) Devils can properly develop Schmid/Daws
The only scary part is his health. But some goalies can last long. If the price isn’t bad I would make the trade.
The majority of goalies in the league are lottery tickets at best. We're talking about a former 1st round pick, that was a hobey baker finalist, great international player who also held his own at the NHL level and is only 22.Knight would be a lottery ticket at best, he's not even at .900 in the AHL this season and he struggled in his last season in the NHL.
I don't mind taking a flyer on him on the side given the upside, but you have to get a real NHL stabilizer.
I understand his historical profile, but that doesn't make him a good NHL goalie. The guy has had significant off-ice issues in addition to mediocre on-ice play for multiple years now. You need a real goalie.The majority of goalies in the league are lottery tickets at best. We're talking about a former 1st round pick, that was a hobey baker finalist, great international player who also held his own at the NHL level and is only 22.
Outside of the top 10-15 goalies in the league there's no such thing as a real NHL stabilizer at goalie. Vanecek was a better than league average goalie with significant starting experience. If Vanecek doesn't fit that category, than all of those "stop gap" options you named certainly don't fit that bill.
VV may be fine somewhere else, but he’s beyond rehabbing here.I'm not big on Markstrom because of his age. Crazy how a career journeyman like Alex Lyon can establish himself as a NHL starter but, we can't find shit! VV last year was a mirage that got exposed when it really mattered. Ugh. We'll never have another Marty but, give me someone who can keep it straight and on the rails and not into a river. Christ!
It feels like throwing crap at the wall and hoping something sticksA 35 year old Markstom for two years should
A.) Not cost too much with no retention
B.) Gives you a stable option as a starter
C.) Devils can properly develop Schmid/Daws
The only scary part is his health. But some goalies can last long and put up good seasons at that age. If the price isn’t bad I would make the trade.
Welcome to goaltending. We drafted Holtz over Askarov and the only semi-premium pick we've used on a goalie in multiple decades was Blackwood, whose career was completely derailed by injuries.It feels like throwing crap at the wall and hoping something sticks
He's a fine two year stopgap at a limited cost, but mid-to-high first round pick(s) and Alex Holtz seem a little rich now that there's no retention and they'll only get two usable playoff runs out of him.I don’t think it is crap. He is a proven starting goalie. For only two seasons, given his age, I don’t think it will cost as much as Flames posters are saying.
View attachment 828082
They are 7 pts out with 2 games in handEh the Flames still have leverage, they’re the team in a playoff hunt a bit more than us so they won’t sell unless it’s an overpay
You can move up to 10 spots in the lottery. Only move 4 spots was how it was back in the day when we won the lottery to pick Larsson.Can only move up like 4 spots now if you win the lottery, so it wouldn't matter anyway. The difference between picking something like 7th overall and 10th overall is negligible.
Yeah I was going by a few days ago, I guess they really fell out of it hence the deleted postThey are 7 pts out with 2 games in hand
We are 5 pts out with 1 gm in hand
Same spot
To your point, they just traded for a “tough” guy.The idea that Ruff has no interest in physical play is also absurd. He was the coach during the Sabres-Senators brawl 15+ years ago. He played Mason Geertsen for 25 games in 2022. He put Brendan Smith in for Game 2 last year because of physical play. He is way more focused on it than I bet even the board is, but he doesn't have the horses for it.
I get that that he's been decent but it seems to me that this is short-sighted and a bandaid to larger problems.I don’t think it is crap. He is a proven starting goalie. For only two seasons, given his age, I don’t think it will cost as much as Flames posters are saying.
View attachment 828082
Yea don’t see any way Florida doesn’t keep him. Unless for some reason they want to go the hanifin route which wouldn’t make sense. I mean Forsling is their best D by far all around and is better than hanifin imo.Gustav Forsling is a UFA at the end of the season. Florida will probably find a way to keep him but in the chance they don't he'd be a better addition for the Devils than Hanifin and should be cheaper too.
All thanks to the Preds going on a hot run. If the Devils could have had just one of those this season and they are on the insideYeah I was going by a few days ago, I guess they really fell out of it hence the deleted post