Fair enough. But using tail-end outcomes for projecting a player I don't think is particularly useful. Then the "range" for most A and B tier prospects would be from "not an NHLer" to "1st line/1st pair player".It’s not a comparable. It’s a range. That’s my view of how they work. Like a bell curve on the ACT. A student has a 1% chance of getting a 36 and maybe a 1.5% chance of getting a 35. The overwhelming majority won’t but in say 8th and 9th grade there are kids that the range might be 31-36 who then refine that as they get older. It doesn’t mean I think it’s likely or realistic. Pick a different player who is feisty and good and smallish. It’s not the top end comparable name that is a big deal.
If you're using a bell curve analogy, a range of 1 standard deviation around the mean is maybe more instructive - whatever you perceive Gritsyuk's mean outcome to be.