The problem I have with the Lou criticism is that so much of it is wrong. It has the "theory" of being right, but in actuality it's wrong. Everyone said Lou was screwed when Tavares left (conveniently left out of your review of the Isles team that Lou took over). Then when they continued to win, it was unsustainable goaltending. Then it was that they only made the playoffs because of the "play-in". Two ECFs later, it's now, "well he took over a very good team" along with lots of talk of how the Isles are screwed for the future. Which is being taken as the new gospel.
I don't really care that the criticism is about Lou. (I am emotionally invested in what he did here, so I care somewhat.) Still, my bigger issue is criticism of someone who's actively trying to win.
All teams eventually hit rough patches. You can continue to forecast that any team will be bad. Eventually, you'll be right. Does that make up for the other X times you were wrong?
At what point do people say they were wrong in their interpretations?
(Note: This is a criticism of the fans, not the Devils. IMO, Fitz does seem to be trying to win. But, I think the Devils fans here have - by and large - been ok with losing for many years.)
I don’t know how I suddenly represent all the criticisms of Lou and/or the Islanders on the board.
I didn’t even dump on him or NYI in the post. I said the Islanders arguably have the best goalie tandem in the NHL this season. Not sure how that can be interpreted as “unsustainable goaltending”.
They did most likely only make the playoffs in 2019-20 because of the shutdown and unique qualifying round. By March they had dropped out of a playoff spot and were bad in pretty much every way possible. That’s just true.
Their 2018-19 scoring by committee was really coming from unexpected places, Cizikas was more of a 3C but their 4C, Filppula, scored 17 goals to go with his 20 that season.
Looks like I overestimated the offense that season though, it was definitely how much they kept GA down in the regular season that was the difference in their best seasons:
SEASON: GF/GP GA/GP
2021-22: 2.79 (22nd-tie) 2.82 (7th-tie) .512%
2020-21: 2.71 (21st) 2.23 (2nd) .634%
2019-20: 2.78 (22nd) 2.79 (9th) .588%
2018-19: 2.72 (22nd) 2.33 (1st) .628%
Statistically speaking, those super low GAs are harder to maintain and the team needs more offense.
You’re assigning me generic alleged ‘board takes’ about the NYI here though. I don’t make all that many forecasts about any team, or as I like to call them, guesses. You can get on a high horse if you predicted the NYI not making the playoffs this season, and also Trotz getting fired, plus correctly guessing what will happen next season. If not, then your guesses are as good as anyone else’s.
I don’t even particularly dislike the Islanders, at least compared to other OG divisional rivals (earmuffs
@Bleedred ). I was enthusiastically rooting against them in the PO but we had picks at stake.
I know we got lectures about the Islanders being contenders that we were supposed to be in quiet unquestioning awe of… or something to that effect. Those lectures were switched to the Rangers this season tho.
People on this board aren’t required to be extra vigilant or scrupulously fair when discussing other GMs or teams.
Post-Devils Lou reminds of things that I do and don’t like about his approach. I just made a few comments, it wasn’t a exhaustive overview. When I said people might overrate the turnaround, he got the GM of the Year award both times they had their playoff runs.
I’m not against him winning those either, though I loath that award. Hell, I consider myself a borderline Lou apologist. I find some of the anti-Lou ranting amusing but they lost, when he retires the Devils org will slobber all over him.
Side Note: I did claim what others say about the Devils never bothers me, but that’s not true. The “Devils ruined hockey” narrative is so rage inducing, I can’t discuss it. I mean, WTF?
I just want to make everyone who says that head explode Scanners style.
So that definitely still bothers me.